Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Gladiola Macro

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default Gladiola Macro

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I've been busy this summer and regret my absence from these forums. Hope I have time to start up again.

    A Gladiola from my garden. Taken indoors with Nikon D300, 105mm macro lens, 2.5 sec., f51, ISO 200. I may have used a Cannon Close up filter 500D.
    Processed in Elements 10: I processed the RAW file twice, once with details and once with low clarity, and combined them. Crop, clone, paint, sharpen, and CEP Darken/Lighten Center.

    I look forward to constructive critique.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nice! I love the color and luminous light, and the composition is very pleasing with the lines radiating up from the bottom to cradle the center of interest, which has lovely sharpness. The darker areas and curve near the top bring the eye back into the center.

  3. #3
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,016
    Threads
    2,604
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Now Anita the table has turned - I am struggling to offer constructive comments on your image! Any how here goes:-

    Firstly - yes I like it - why? The pattern the composition and the delicate structures and colours. I really like the contrast of the stamens and the light is beautifully soft.

    I don't understand why you combined two raw conversions if one was for detail and one was not - I have possibly misunderstood something but my first thought would be wouldn't one be fighting the other... but maybe you have masked certain parts??
    CEP - sorry what does this mean?

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Ashton View Post
    I don't understand why you combined two raw conversions if one was for detail and one was not - I have possibly misunderstood something but my first thought would be wouldn't one be fighting the other... but maybe you have masked certain parts??
    CEP - sorry what does this mean?
    Good questions. In this case I didn't mask. Instead, I put the smoother version on top of the more detailed version, and set the opacity to 60% and blending mode to lighter color. I was experimenting to see what results I would get, and I liked what I saw.
    CEP is Color Effex Pro by Nik.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Maryland's Eastern Shore, beside Fairlee Creek near the Chesapeake Bay
    Posts
    1,961
    Threads
    344
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Anita.

    I like what you have produced here but don't understand how or why you did it the way you have described. For me, the beautiful soft pink curves accented by the dark contrasting structures are enough to make me say well done!

    Norm

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm Dulak View Post
    Hi Anita.

    I like what you have produced here but don't understand how or why you did it the way you have described. For me, the beautiful soft pink curves accented by the dark contrasting structures are enough to make me say well done!

    Norm
    Thanks, Norm. I don't know if I can justify what i did, but, in an attempt to explain, I'm posting the two files that i combined. One has detail where I want it. The other has smoothness where I want it. Don't know if it explains anything. Maybe I could have gotten the same result in a different way.
    :-)

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Welcome back, Anita. What a coincidence--a few days ago I was thinking about how I miss your consistently excellent work in this forum. I hope you are able to come back on a more consistent basis...

    I really like this image a lot! The blending worked out very well; you set the opacity of the soft layer just right and I like the result much better than either of the two versions that went into it. I wish I could see more of the stamen on the right, but that just keeps drawing my eye back to it. I do find the brightest area middle to upper right a little distracting, but you could easily bring it down a touch if you agree. VWD. And I'm a sucker for abstract macro work, so great to see someone else posting it!

  8. #8
    BPN Member Bill Jobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,275
    Threads
    91
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nicely done, Anita ! And it doesn't matter to me how you got there.

    With the googolplex possible options in post production, the creative adventure can twist and turn with a single click.

    We are fortunate to have these tools available. I can't count the times a whim in Photoshop and myriad plug-ins took me to surprising places.
    Bill Jobes



    www.billjobes.com

    My BPN Gallery

    Walk Softly and Carry a Big Lens

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Simply beautiful, Anita, as all your flower images are! Luscious pink shades and delicate lines for a lovely, soft & glowing image. Thank you for explaining your approach. The layering brought out the best of both.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mitch Haimov View Post
    Welcome back, Anita. What a coincidence--a few days ago I was thinking about how I miss your consistently excellent work in this forum. I hope you are able to come back on a more consistent basis...

    I really like this image a lot! The blending worked out very well; you set the opacity of the soft layer just right and I like the result much better than either of the two versions that went into it. I wish I could see more of the stamen on the right, but that just keeps drawing my eye back to it. I do find the brightest area middle to upper right a little distracting, but you could easily bring it down a touch if you agree. VWD. And I'm a sucker for abstract macro work, so great to see someone else posting it!
    Thank you for your detailed critique. I was especially glad to have that bright area pointed out.

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Nottingham, PA, USA
    Posts
    7,038
    Threads
    427
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank all of you for your comments.

  12. #12
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    35
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anita Bower View Post
    Thank you for your detailed critique. I was especially glad to have that bright area pointed out.
    You are quite welcome, Anita.

    (In re-reading my prior post I realized that my comment regarding right stamen is ambiguous--what I meant was having it partially hidden works out well for me as I keep going back to look at it.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics