Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Turkey Vulture, Central California Coast

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    274
    Threads
    71
    Thank You Posts

    Default Turkey Vulture, Central California Coast

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This bird was flying along the edge of the coast road south of Big Sur. The road here is cut into a cliff, and the edge of the road has strong updrafts.

    Canon 5Dmk3
    Canon EF70-200 f/2.8L IS II USM at 190mm
    1/800, f/8.0, ISO 400

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi, Bill. Nice under-wing shot of these cool look critters. I'm using a crummy monitor here at work, so take my critique with a grain of salt. I think the vulture's head might be a bit too hot on top. It would have been nice to have a bit more light on the eye and side of the face.

  3. #3
    BPN Member Bill Jobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,275
    Threads
    91
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I agree with Ian's evaluation, Bill.

    This is a good look at a generally under-appreciated and seldom photographed bird.

    You don't say whether you were using any positive exposure compensation, but even a +1 would have revealed more of the underbody of the bird.

    You could then selectively tone down the over-exposed sunlit top of the head.
    Bill Jobes



    www.billjobes.com

    My BPN Gallery

    Walk Softly and Carry a Big Lens

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    274
    Threads
    71
    Thank You Posts

    Default Adjusted Turkey Vulture

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks for the comments. I was not using exposure compensation. The bird was flying sometimes above my altitude, as here, where plus compensation would have helped, and sometimes below, where it would have been a problem. However, there is some headroom for adjustments. This version has the top of the head adjusted down, and the eye brightened a bit.

    Bill

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The repost looks much better.Image is nice and sharp and nice wing spread.
    Were you shooting in manual? If you were, you should have increased your exposure compensation by decreasing shutter speed or increasing the aperture so that you were at +1 or even +1 1/3. This would have allowed proper exposure on the belly. The sky might be a bit blown out but it is easy to deal with that in PP.
    I like your comp but could also see this as a pano with more off the bottom.
    Gail

  6. #6
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,549
    Threads
    1,284
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Bill, espose for the bird, ignore the BKG when it's backlit like this. You can then retrieve the BKG later in PP, or just create a Smart Object and combine.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics