Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: King of the Mountain

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default King of the Mountain

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I visited the Mountain Goats of Mount Evans, Colorado earlier this week. On my first day I had about 45 minutes of ground-hugging clouds moving in, like fog, and then heavy hail and rain, that forced me down the mountain. I liked the way the fog muted the bkgd. The fog varied from thick to thin and I stayed with the goats as long as I dared, photographing the varying conditions. For this image, the fog was thin enough for a clear image of the goat, but not the bkgd.

    Mount Evans is 14,264 ft (4328 m) at the top and the highest paved road in the US makes getting there wonderfully convenient. The hard part is breathing at that altitude!

    Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS @ 95mm, 1/2500, f8, ISO 800, resting on a rock (the camera, and me!)

    C & C most appreciated.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy - what a great moody image. F8 was a great choice and the pov and comp both work very well. I think you can still get a bit more detail out of it. I did a levels mask adjustment just to the goat bringing in the right hand slider to 1.42 and moving the middle slider slightly to the left to give the midtones a bit more punch at .93. Finally, I applied a 45% screen adjustment to the eye. If you decide to go back to the image I might consider backing off the sharpening of the fg rocks just slightly. Also watch the horns as there is a very slight halo. These are all minor things that can be easily tweaked.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  3. #3
    BPN Member jack williamson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    south mississippi
    Posts
    1,979
    Threads
    107
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is really excellent, you must have been very close for 95mm. I thought the OP was great but Rachel's tweaks have really helped. Well done.

    Jack

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, California, United States
    Posts
    3,023
    Threads
    416
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is a very nice image and Rachel took it up a notch. I like the brighter white and more lively eye in Rachel's RP. Loi

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well Nancy, not much more to say, as I think Rachel has covered a lot of what I would have suggested, although if the adjustments were in Levels I think she meant 244, not 1.42? If you do then I might mask the slightly brighter areas to retain the subtle tone in them. Obviously your position was perhaps less than idea to shoot from and safety comes first, but I wonder if there was a chance in moving slightly more to the left might have removed the small vertical rock on the RHS? Not a deal breaker just a thought. Your PP is certainly coming along nicely too, a lovely image, but the mist as you say, really adds to the scene and conveys the mountain look & feel.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Of course Steve is correct, 242.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you all. Rachel, I see the subtle pop from your adjustments and will do likewise. And Steve, that is a good idea to mask the brightest parts to keep them from losing detail. I am bummed about that OOF front rock on the right side. The boulders here were a huge jumble and very difficult to scramble through. I don't remember if I could have moved left.
    Jack, these mountain goats are habituated to people and if you move slowly & sit quietly they can be very tolerant.

  8. #8
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,562
    Threads
    1,286
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    am bummed about that OOF front rock on the right side.
    Hi Nancy, as I said, it's not a deal breaker, however it might be something that you pick up on next time you visit and lookout for.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bangalore, India
    Posts
    759
    Threads
    78
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    lovely portrait! exp & details are excellent. the environment adds a lot the image.

  10. #10
    BPN Member vishaljadhav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Pune , India
    Posts
    1,711
    Threads
    94
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wow thats close and beautiful
    i love the details

  11. #11
    Story Sequences Moderator and Wildlife Moderator Gabriela Plesea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    7,738
    Threads
    455
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful image Nancy! Love the detail, the colours are fantastic!

    Kind regards,
    Gabriela Plesea

  12. #12
    Lifetime Member Andre Pretorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Hluhluwe, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    Posts
    1,237
    Threads
    135
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice detail on darks and whites, DOF effective with BG. The fog really added a bit of mystique to image. Agree with the rock in RHC, but we can't have it all
    Regards

    Andre.

    www.gappimages.com

  13. #13
    BPN Member Anette Mossbacher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,818
    Threads
    95
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nice image Nancy, great details. Love the moody in this

  14. #14
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you, everyone! The mountain goats are great fun to photograph.

  15. #15
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,917
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Nancy ,
    great one with nice PP work.
    Like the dull colors and and the lovely detail you worked out of the image.
    Comp works fine for me as presented, would not change anything.

    are they all the time that relaxed in that place ? If so you are lucky i think.

    TFS Andreas

  16. #16
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Russellville, Arkansas
    Posts
    5,189
    Threads
    674
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Andreas, yes, they are always relaxed with people here. They even bring their babies. I am lucky to have these animals live only 3 hours away from me. I wrote an article about this place and the mt. goats for Denise Ippolito's August edition of her mini-mag. You might want to see it when she puts it online, generally the first of the month.

  17. #17
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,917
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the info , much appreciated

    Andreas

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics