Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Defacing Photography

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Valle de Cauca, Colombia
    Posts
    282
    Threads
    45
    Thank You Posts

    Default Defacing Photography

    What exactly is the purpose of emblazing a "watermark" across your photo? To me it seems like spraying graffiti over a work of architecture. Is the idea that with your "watermark" emblazoned on the photo no one can "steal" it off the internet and print it and sell it? Or use it elsewhere on the net and claim it as their own? I used to see these things scrawled across the middle of the subject, say a woman's belly in a model photograph but that practice seems to be disappearing thank heavens. These days they seem to be placed where they don't compromise the subject of the image such as off in a clean area with sky or something. I imagine that's for maximum legibility. I can see it if you want to use your photo as basically an advertising poster for your business or maybe if you just want to "sign" your photo for other online viewers to see but if the motive is supposed to be some kind of security measure for the photo it's self that seems completely silly. I mean what's to prevent an unscrupulous web surfer from just photoshopping your name off if he or she wants to use it on the net and doesn't feel your "watermark" adds to the aesthetics of the photo? And as far as I've seen no one ever posts high resolution print quality files on forums etc. It's just too cumbersome and the image is no more impressive than after being resized for posting so the issue of that kind of "theft" should be moot . So then what am I missing here? What important benefit do watermarkers gain in exchange for defacing their own photos?
    Last edited by Peter Dexter; 05-28-2013 at 07:02 PM.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Corning, NY
    Posts
    2,507
    Threads
    208
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Peter, many of us here have had images downloaded from the web to be used for desk top or screen saver images. Some have been used for postcards and 4X6 prints. Our images have shown up on a few on line portfolio sites without permission. That said I agree about the "defacing" question. I try to place a copyright notice in an unobtrusive area. I also try to ensure that my metadata including copyright follows the image at all times, although some sites strip this on upload.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,546
    Threads
    171
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Peter

    Every car i have bought and every camera i own (to name just a few has items) have been 'defaced' to use your terms by the maker... and I do it to my images for the same reason they do it..to identify the source. I do try and keep my tag small and unobtrusive as I agree that large names can distract and they don't really stop theft anyway.

    Don

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics