My recent post of a Lesser Goldfinch didn't have a great BG, to me. It was "creamy" (sort of) but the whole image was just not interesting. I think it would be better with the suggested wider crop. I find the image boring, but I think it isn't because of the BG. I usually love creamy BGs.
I shot this woodpecker with about the same specs but he/she/it was farther from the camera so the BG shows more detail because the focus is a little closer to it. (Not much -- about 7-8 ft for the finch and 16 ft for the woodpecker.) Also f/16 vs. f/13 for the finch -- that contributed some of the difference. Just curious how this BG would compare to a creamy one, for folks. But I think it depends so much on the image, as well as individual preference.
Canon 5D II, 300mm f/2.8 IS + 1.4X II. Sturdy Gitzo tripod, Wimberley head. ISO 1600, f/16. 1/200 sec (limited by sync speed of fill flash.)
Shot as a horizontal; cropped in from the sides and a little canvas added at the top and a slight trim from the bottom.







Reply With Quote
