Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Viewing images, monitor vs prints

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer Tom Graham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Southern California, Orange County
    Posts
    1,116
    Threads
    33
    Thank You Posts

    Default Viewing images, monitor vs prints

    I have a theory that I'm still researching that large white (or near white) areas in an image are more "acceptable" when the image is a print versus been viewed on a monitor. Especially better on a B&W print.
    A print is viewed using a reflected light source. While a monitor 's light is directed/projected(?). Large white areas (of image) when seen on a monitor "overwhelm" the image. Causing much distraction from the subject. And no I do not think my monitor's white is too bright. Maybe it is? My all white screen measures ISO 200, f3.5, 1/60. Dr. Clark - is this too bright?

    Regards - Tom

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Irvine, CA, USA
    Posts
    358
    Threads
    24
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    What is your monitor's brightness set at (in cd/m2)? Mine is calibrated to 100, and pure white does not seem overwhelming.

    John

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer Tom Graham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Southern California, Orange County
    Posts
    1,116
    Threads
    33
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks John.
    I used my Pantone eye1 (monitor calibrator) to measure a white screen and it read 132 Lux. I think in this usage cd/m2 is same as Lux? I do not find a white screeen overwhelming either. My monitor is IPS type, NEC 2070NX.
    To perhaps further illustrate my contention, why does this white print on a black background work fine, while if on a print it would, I think, be hard to read?
    Tom
    just north of you in Fullerton

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics