Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Bicolored Hawk (A. bicolor) Costa Rica

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    85
    Threads
    23
    Thank You Posts

    Default Bicolored Hawk (A. bicolor) Costa Rica

    Hi everybody heres my favorite hawk i found the nest few km from my house critics and comments are welcome
    efix
    canon 60 + 100-400 L is usm
    iso 500
    400mm @ f/11
    1/20 sec, tripode n cable
    few clone spots on photoshop, noise reduction to the background, sharpen and levels to the bird
    image can be seen here with a little more quality
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8027302...ream/lightbox/

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Trinidad & Tobago
    Posts
    329
    Threads
    17
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great shot Nelson, however the BG is a bit distracting with all those spots of light. I understand that these may be totally unavoidable though! Maybe if you opened up to f/7.1 or so, even 6.3 the BG may have been smoothed a bit. I'm guessing you shot at f/11 to get the entire bird in focus?

  3. Thanks Nelson Mena Alfaro thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well its a beauty and I can see why it is your favorite hawk. Good vertical comp overall...you could place the subject a bit lower in the frame. It may be also worthwhile to patch up the various white spots in the BG. The clone and patch tools would work well, or content aware. I'm finding a bit of a green cast too, easy fix by adding a touch of magenta in "Color Balance". Love the view of the talon, and the eye looks great. I'd recommend opening up the paerture to give you more SS and to help with softening the BG, but you still got a nice result here.

  5. Thanks Nelson Mena Alfaro thanked for this post
  6. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    85
    Threads
    23
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    thansk for comments, faraaz i also have some photos at f/5.6, but bird little soft, 100-400 lens not sharp at all :)

  7. #5
    Lifetime Member Marina Scarr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    10,347
    Threads
    403
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is quite a nice image. Your bird's pose is quite nice. I think if you took a little bit of space off of the bottom and added a little to the top it would look as though your bird were lower in the frame.

    I have a 100-400 that I use a lot and am very happy with the sharpness but I hear there are some copies that aren't as sharp. This should be quite sharp at F11. I would do a little bit more sharpening of the bird if it were mine.
    Marina Scarr
    Florida Master Naturalist
    Website, Facebook

  8. Thanks Nelson Mena Alfaro thanked for this post
  9. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    85
    Threads
    23
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marina Scarr View Post
    This is quite a nice image. Your bird's pose is quite nice. I think if you took a little bit of space off of the bottom and added a little to the top it would look as though your bird were lower in the frame.

    I have a 100-400 that I use a lot and am very happy with the sharpness but I hear there are some copies that aren't as sharp. This should be quite sharp at F11. I would do a little bit more sharpening of the bird if it were mine.
    Thanks marina, i dont think lens is a copy, when i say soft i mean not sharp like 300 2.8 at 15 meters, but i think thats too obvious hehehe price + quality thanks for comments again (:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics