Results 1 to 32 of 32

Thread: Gorilla Portrait with 300 II and 2x III (C)

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default Gorilla Portrait with 300 II and 2x III (C)

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    We finally had some warmer weather so I went back to the Bronx Zoo with my new toys, including a monopod, to practice. Shot through glass. I should have gone for a bit more dof but was worried about ss and am still resistant to cranking up the ISO higher than 1600 even with the 5D3.

    Canon 5D3
    300 II + 2.0x III
    1/800
    f6.3
    ISO 1600
    Cropped from horizontal, levels, curves, selective dodging, burning and color adjustments, sharpened in CS6.

    C&C welcome and appreciated. Thanks,

    Rachel

    P.S. Before Morkel asks, yes I converted it to b&w too and will post that in the next post.

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default B&W Version

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Converted in CS6.

  3. #3
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quite a face ...
    In this case the colour works best for me - I think it's the eyes that have distinct colour over the mostly monochromatic look of everything else even in colour. Might tone down the OP a bit with luminosity adjustments?
    I too wish for more DOF, Rachel...particularly to get the nose/mouth sharp.
    Looks like this combo works, though - would be interesting to compare with the real 600mm .

    PS: Crank that ISO!
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Morkel, I should have said I already ran luminosity masks but can perhaps run another. I'm sure the IQ is better with the 600 but I can carry the 300 around all day and would need a sherpa for the 600 .

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,546
    Threads
    171
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel, I prefer the colour as well as the mouth& eyes looks more 'natural', or more to the point, the b&W looks a little less natural.... This is an awesome image though, very intense stare... Seems fuzzy noses are in at the moment huh? DON PS am I the only one having the text editing difficulty..? ie the 'return' key does not work?

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Don. I am not having any difficulties with the
    ...
    ...
    return key.

    Thanks again,
    Rachel

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,546
    Threads
    171
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hmm, Thank Rachel.. My 'return' worked in a word document Ok, maybe I just need to reboot my machine, possibly with a much larger boot...DON

  8. Thanks Pieter de Waal thanked for this post
  9. #8
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Rachel, quite a powerful looking portrait and I think you did well shooting through glass, not the ideal way, so think what you might have achieved in the open Not sure if the glass would cut down any light, but agree with Morkel, crank up that ISO, you saw my Blackbird and having that extra DOF really would have made a difference. I like the pose and the eyes looking away, less confrontational.

    Looking at both postings I think there is some merit in a combo, plus really pushing things in the darks to give a bit of 'grit', Morkel I think you should have a play, be nice to see some options perhaps with your B/W hat on? Trying to avoid 'gimmicks or over processing', but sometimes you have to get your thinking out of the system to know if it works, or not. Seems you are really happy with the combo and it's really paying off.

    Rachel here's my take on the above:
    Duplicated the layer
    Col Efex applied Tonal & detail
    SilverEfex to get a B/W add added a 'Coffee tone' set to a low % (yes occasionally I do use it)
    Applied one of my Tonal/Channel curves
    Upped tha saturation on the colour version
    Exposure adjustment to darken the BKD
    Masked and brought through the respective layers
    Flattened, sharpened.

    Not sure, but thought it might be worth a punt.

    cheers
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  10. #9
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Steve, I think it does have merit and for some reason (totally my own weird thinking) I am more willing to play around with my "practice" images of captive animals than with those shot out in the field. I took advantage of the recent offer and now have the whole suite of Nik software so will have to play a bit.

    Thanks again,
    Rachel

  11. #10
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel, if it only makes you go and explore then I'm happy. I think you are right about Captive & Wild.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  12. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I love the B/W with color left in the eyes! It seems to make the OOF areas less noticeable.

    I'm with you, Rachel, with not wanting to go above 1600 on the 5D3. But with bracketing so easy, I'm now trying to go higher with more DOF for a second shot if I have time. Too little DOF can be a problem.

    The amount of degradation from high ISO really bugs me when I look at things at 100%. It limits the ability to crop and also to recover shadow detail. (I try to expose to the right, but sometimes you can't go far enough without blowing highlights beyond recovery.)

    On lenses: I've been using the 300 f/2.8 IS for several years, often with a 2X. I recently got the 600 "II" and still use the 300 when weight is a factor and 600 is enough. The closer MFD makes it a keeper. I haven't done careful IQ comparisons but I'm still very pleased with the IQ of the 300 + 2X.

  13. #12
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Diane. It would be great if you posted some of your wildlife shots too.

    Rachel

  14. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I've just recently had time to be active here; have posted some birds in the last few months but no other wildlife. I'll branch out eventually... Often don't past the Avian forum before getting interrupted.

  15. #14
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Northern Rockies
    Posts
    1,273
    Threads
    106
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel, I prefer the OP. I like the hint of brown hair on the face, the color of the all-too-human eyes & the hint of color in the ape's mouth. In spite of the DOF, I think this is an arresting image as the image is about the eyes & they are sharp. TFS.
    Andrew

  16. #15
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Rachel, I just posted one, but had to put it in Out of the Box.

  17. #16
    BPN Member Anette Mossbacher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,818
    Threads
    95
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel,

    great portrait of this proud Gorilla. I like your OP best. The RP of Steve is great with the bit more darker 'vignette' applied. Not sure if that is a vignette! Anyway, I like the brown hair coming through Rachel's OP, but I assume that is more of personal taste

    Ciao
    Anette

  18. #17
    BPN Member Steve Uffman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    77
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diane Miller View Post
    I love the B/W with color left in the eyes! It seems to make the OOF areas less noticeable.


    On lenses: I've been using the 300 f/2.8 IS for several years, often with a 2X. I recently got the 600 "II" and still use the 300 when weight is a factor and 600 is enough. The closer MFD makes it a keeper. I haven't done careful IQ comparisons but I'm still very pleased with the IQ of the 300 + 2X.

    I'm with you, Rachel, with not wanting to go above 1600 on the 5D3. But with bracketing so easy, I'm now trying to go higher with more DOF for a second shot if I have time. Too little DOF can be a problem.

    The amount of degradation from high ISO really bugs me when I look at things at 100%. It limits the ability to crop and also to recover shadow detail. (I try to expose to the right, but sometimes you can't go far enough without blowing highlights beyond recovery.)


    My 2 cents...I hear both you and Rachel on the ISO 1600 but there is an every increasing cadre that are going up to 3200 and beyond. Its a bit out of the box for some. Chas is going higher on his 1dx as well.....I have both the 5dIII and the 1dx and their low light capabilities are pretty good.


    Now a request for feedback on the 300II vs the 600II....I am debating what to do. I have the 500 f/4 but not the II. I have the 70-300....have the latest 2x and 1.4x converters. Thinking of what I should get for her.....300 II with the 2x for reach (reasons Rachal discussed) or keep the 500 for her and get the 600II for me

  19. #18
    BPN Member Steve Uffman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    586
    Threads
    77
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Rachal, and BTW, I meant to say how much I like the gorilla....OP and Steve's....I think you will like the Nik Collection....I use Define selectively now for noise reduction and am real pleased. On Color Efex Pro 4, I suggest downloading the additional recipes they have available. Sometimes I will scan through them on an image and frequently get some ideas. Actually have sold some images using some recipes that were Out of the Box for me but produced some dramatic effects that caused somebody to want to write a check

  20. #19
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steve, there was a thread all about the 300f/2.8, 500 & 600 I think recently, not sure if this helps?
    http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...r-lens-dilemma

    You might also want to check this out too?
    http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...-pros-and-cons

    If anyone else has questions as per Steve's Uffman's reply, please can you start a new thread as this will otherwise go off topic. Thanks
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  21. #20
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Andrew, Anette and Steve. Steve - thanks for the tip about the additional recipes. I'll look for them. Btw so far I like the flexibility of the 300 and the t/cs as well as the lighter weight but I tend to shoot larger mammals rather than birds most of the time. What does your wife shoot mostly?

    Thanks again,
    Rachel

    Sorry Steve K. - we posted at the same time.
    Last edited by Rachel Hollander; 04-02-2013 at 10:47 AM.

  22. Thanks Anette Mossbacher thanked for this post
  23. #21
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    NY Metro
    Posts
    312
    Threads
    46
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice shots from the combo, Rachel. Sure you're loving the lens, it's quiet a piece of glass
    For this one, I like the tonality of Steve's PP.
    TFS

  24. #22
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Shreyas

  25. #23
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    mmmm....will take Steve up on his offer...
    watch this space...
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  26. #24
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Here's my take, Rachel and Steve.
    Tried to enhance the eyes through dodging and burning and added some more contrast to the face through more dodging and burning......I'm old school that way these days. Doing all my conversions in PS. Slightly toned with a sepia tint (2%).

    WDYT?
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  27. #25
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Morkel - Thanks for the rp. The additional contrast has made him look a bit more menacing. Interesting how the changes can have different effects. I generally use PS for my conversions as well.

    Thanks again,
    Rachel

  28. #26
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Indeed. Perhaps I pushed it a bit...

    I meant that where I used to do many of my conversions in Silver Efex, I'm now doing it all in PS B&Wmodule and enhancing with dodge/burn and luminosity and curves adjustments...
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  29. #27
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Parsonsfield, Maine
    Posts
    2,183
    Threads
    199
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Merwin View Post
    Hi Rachel, I prefer the OP. I like the hint of brown hair on the face, the color of the all-too-human eyes & the hint of color in the ape's mouth. In spite of the DOF, I think this is an arresting image as the image is about the eyes & they are sharp. TFS.
    I'm with Andrew! Nice one Rachel. I love the eyes and the turned away look. Very nice indeed.

  30. #28
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Grady

  31. #29
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    George, South Africa
    Posts
    1,462
    Threads
    255
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Rachel

    I hope u don't mind me playing with image... this is just my vision of a you're lovely image.....

  32. #30
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Rotonda West , FL
    Posts
    3,642
    Threads
    198
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Awesome expression you've captured and I soo wish you had more dof on the mouth area. I prefer the OP colors but Steve definately created a winner too. Funny how we all have our own ideas and visions of what works and that's a good thing. I would have never guessed you shot this thru glass either.

  33. #31
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Peter and Cheryl, much appreciate the comments. Peter -your rp looks the most sinister yet.

  34. #32
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Eagle River Valley, Alaska
    Posts
    1,371
    Threads
    64
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A riveting image, Rachel. There are now so many excellent versions in the reposts, that it's difficult to decide which is now the best. Visage very nicely expressed.

  35. Thanks Rachel Hollander thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics