Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Great Blue Heron

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Waveland, MS
    Posts
    48
    Threads
    19
    Thank You Posts

    Default Great Blue Heron

    Here's a shot I took the other day. Processing was pretty standard (NR, sharpening, levels and curves), and I added a little extra blur to the OOF areas. C&C always welcome.

    Canon 7D
    Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L lens
    1/320 second, f/5.6, ISO 400


    Great Blue Heron, 11x14 by ScubaDude1960, on Flickr

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Eric,

    I love the background greens and natural colors, very nice,.. but the bottom perch is a bit too distracting. Consider taking a layer off the bottom at least 1/2 inch IMO,..use a piece of notebook paper over the screen and find the best look,..then crop accordingly. You have hot pixels in the crown too, bump-up the shutter,...need more speed here. Check out the histogram, especially the right side it has clipped some data and that is lost detail. What was the time of day - always shoot, check, adjust and shoot again and remember to set your exposure for the whites/brights first. In this case look at the white feathers on the head,..that is the zone you must get right everything else will fall into place. The image is a bit soft too probably due to shutter speed.

    Curious, did you brace on a tree or what carry a tripod. The image has a good feel and the colors are very nice and your subject placement is good,..nice moment with nature,..keep em coming and thanks for posting.
    Last edited by Jeff Cashdollar; 03-25-2013 at 04:29 PM.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Waveland, MS
    Posts
    48
    Threads
    19
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hey Jeff,

    Thanx for the comments. I always appreciate them. I may try to clone out the small branch sticking out towards the camera on the bottom-left, which I find distracting. The tree itself, to me, adds more details to look at, tho I might crop it up to just below the bottom of the U-shaped section that the bird is standing on. The blown-out white area on the face isn't clipped in the original RAW file, but there was no detail... not sure what caused that; I tried the "shadows/highlights" adjustment in PS, ran it thru Photomatix details enhancer, nothing worked. In post, I adjusted levels to maximize the dynamic range, which gave the area some totally saturated pixels. I took the shot at 7:49 am, and I used a monopod to steady the camera. Pixel-peeping shows a slight bit of lateral movement. Luckily, there are dozens (hundreds?) of GBHs in the area and many have adapted well to being around humans, so there's always another day (I'll be back out this morning when the sun comes up).

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    McAllen, TX
    Posts
    636
    Threads
    42
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice photo Eric, and agree with Jeff's analysis as well. Good luck with your outing! I'll look forward to the next installment. :)

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Eric,

    Thanks for the feedback, interesting about the lose of detail.? Just be thinking about the white areas when setting the exposure, otherwise well done. As you know, shooting 400MM takes skill, steady hands and shutter speed,..lots of magnification and detail!

    Go back and get em again,..look forward to seeing more.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics