Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Rocky

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Islip Terrace NY
    Posts
    230
    Threads
    20
    Thank You Posts

    Default Rocky

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Was at our local park and came across this relatively cooperative Racoon.
    Nikon D3
    300 2.8 w/1.4x
    ISO 1250
    1/2000 at f 4
    Handheld
    Forgot to mention cloned out a stick in left foreground
    Last edited by Gen Benjamin; 03-22-2013 at 08:48 AM. Reason: forgot info

  2. #2
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Gen, nice placement in frame, overall colours, pose and head to camera, perfect timing.

    In the hope of trying to spur some dialog & replies/feedback I have a couple of observations which would be interesting to know the thoughts of others and hopefully may give Gen a better response:

    - Do people feel that the techs look right or is there anything that you may suggest in changing?
    - Does the BKG look right as it was shot at f/4, is it too smooth, should have a bit more detail albeit quite OOF?
    - POV, looks good, or even lower?
    - Any Post production (PP) thoughts to improve the image?
    - Does anyone else have any points, or questions in critiquing this image?

    Just trying to take a different tac in encouraging people to comment & critique so the poster gets more varied feedback and that people can build on the critquing, I hope this works, or at least is a starting point.

    Gen I will come back in due course with my thoughts.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  3. Thanks Gen Benjamin thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Gen - Nice view of what looks like a youngster. Btw I would be concerned with encountering a L.I. raccoon in daylight (lots of documented cases of rabies in the L.I. population). As for the image - great eye contact and low pov. I thought it looked a little bright overall and ran a luminosity mask at 40% and also dropped the reds by -15. Finally, I burned the brighter areas of the muzzle by 6%. You can probably extract more detail there on the RAW file, similarly you might be able to bring out a bit more detail in the mask area too. WDYT?

    TFS,
    Rachel

  5. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Islip Terrace NY
    Posts
    230
    Threads
    20
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachael it does look nicer toned down, I'm going top rework it with your suggestions and see how it looks. This little guy did not appear rabid or ill in any way other than a lame back foot, totally uninterested or bothered by me at all but of course always error on the side of caution
    Thanks
    Gen

  6. #5
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A nice Raccoon photo.
    It seems a bit warm and too brown, but that could be a regional difference, they are gray or black where I live.
    The PP looks fine to me, maybe a bit over sharpened but fine as presented.
    I like to look at raccoons, I don't like to interact with them!
    Dan Kearl

  7. Thanks Gen Benjamin thanked for this post
  8. #6
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Gen, OK now I'm back so I can look at it in a bit more depth.

    As I said earlier, I like the pose and position in frame, I think you could go lower, but just personal taste, looks good as presented. With the SS you had I think more DOF would have been better and given you more scope. Not sure where the focus point was, but to me it wasn't in the area of the head as the eyes aren't sharp. The FG grass in front and around the tail looks sharp, likewise the chest body, and I guessing, but perhaps the FP was on the nose? If the body looks sharp then the jutting legs by the tip of the tail should be also sharp IMHO. I do like the diffused BKG as it separates the subject and the soft muted colour tones. I would suggest looking at a Luminosity layer just to help soften the brighter creams & whites and try to get a bit more detail/tone on the RHS by the nose. It also adds a bit more depth/tone to the surrounding FG grass which I think helps in giving a bit more of a platform for the subject to sit on. Applying a Curves adjustment also just gives a bit more depth to the body fur, but avoid applying around the dark face markings, you don't want to clog those, in fact I might look at just opening them up just a fraction. If you ran any NR on the BKG then I think you need to apply some to the foot of the image too, just about half an inch from the trim.

    I think overall this just needs some subtle tweaks to take it to the next stage, this is not it by any shape or form, but hope it illustrates some of the points I made above.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  9. Thanks Gen Benjamin thanked for this post
  10. #7
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Lovely pose and exposure here Gen. Your initial repost is an improvement, and Steve's repost takes it to another level IMHO.
    I do think you could tone down the warmth somewhat?
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  11. Thanks Gen Benjamin thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics