-
-
love this. great bird, lovely BG and colours. could have done with a bit more space I feel.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Macro and Flora Moderator
A pleasing image from a compositional point of view, I think the processing is a little too heavy, perhaps a tad too saturated and I think there is a slight yellow/green cast probably due to the surrounding foliage. I would also consider burning the highlight so the uppermost surface of the branch, and in addition add a little canvas to the base (tail almost cut off).
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Vikram, I like the details. Also liked the light reflected in the eye.
I'd have preferred a non-sqaure crop here...a vertical or horizontal both would work better IMO.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Vikram, nice bird, nice colors and sharp. I would take some canvas off the top and add some to the bottom to get an aspect ratio in the 4/3 range. Also the detail in the white and red hilites on the head are blown out and probably could have been at least somewhat recovered (along with the hilites on the top of the perch) if you shot this in RAW. A few degrees of CCW head rotation would have been helpful, but the eye contact is pretty good. This is a personal thing, but I like to clean up the beak, removing food and at least some of the scars.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Nice capture of this colorful woodpecker. Looks like a female or juvenile? I would have given the tail more room.
-
Nice shot and agree with the above comments. I think if you'd desaturate it about 20%, the blown reds could be recovered.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Nice pose, colours and details. I wish for more room at the bottom of the frame.
-
Post a Thank You. - 2 Thanks
-
This is something amazing. Vertical tight frame would be better in my opinion. :)
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-