Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Cold Winters Evening

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    1,376
    Threads
    213
    Thank You Posts

    Default Cold Winters Evening

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Im using you knowledgeable folks as a means to determine the viability of certain recent images from Ottawa that I am on the fence with. I figure anyone can post their best stuff but I would rather use you guys as a sounding board on the iffy ones.

    What are your opinions with this image as presented or would you crop right below the trees? Is it a keeper or toss it altogether ? My feelings cant be hurt so dont pull any punches whenever I post.

    MLKIII, 1/250,f/9,ISO 800, 73mm

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,132
    Threads
    193
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mike,

    If it were mine, I would ask myself if the treeline adds to the image. IMO, it does not. I think this would be nicer as a wider shot. Taking maybe even a little off the bottom too.

    I think, in general, the image is a bit flat. While the owl is the clear subject, he blends in too much with the rest of the image. I would attribute this to the flat light.

    Just my thoughts.

    Miguel

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi MIke,
    I have looked at this for quite a while and I very much like the environmental aspect of the shot. It really shows where these GGO's hang out.
    I would crop a bit off the bottom.
    I tried the crop below the trees and it really changes the feel of the image from warm to cool.I prefer warm.
    My first thought when I saw this was this would be awesome if shot for HDR. I don't suppose you shot at -1/3 and +1/3 from these settings? It would be nice to have more light on the GGO and I don't feel comfortable in flashing owls so shooting to expose the owl at +1/3 or +2/3 would have been great.
    I would selectively reduce the exposure on the sky to bring out the colors and increase the exposure on the GGO.
    I think this is a keeper with some tweaks,
    Gail

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Marina Scarr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    10,347
    Threads
    403
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is a keeper all day long for me. I love the environmental feel and all of the different elements of the environment. I would take a sliver off of the right side up to remove the very thn grass but keep the larger one and then a little heavier crop off of the bottom. Love the light shining through all the trees. I am okay with the exposure on the GGO where it is b/c it is sunset or just after.
    Marina Scarr
    Florida Master Naturalist
    Website, Facebook

  5. #5
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    MIKE:

    A keeper for sure. Before looking at other folks comments, I was going to suggest a neutral density gradient over the top to darken the sky and show a little more detail there. This will also make the owl appear brighter, but as has been mentioned, I would lighten the owl just a bit selectively, crop a bit off bottom and right. I did a version with those changes when you first posted your image, and liked the result. I use Color Efex Detail extractor over the owl to make him pop just a bit from the foreground.

    For me I would def. leave the sky.

    Cheers

    Randy
    MY BPN ALBUMS

    "Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    111
    Threads
    15
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    beautiful image, loved the magic atmosphere.

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member Marina Scarr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    10,347
    Threads
    403
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    PS: I love the windblown look and the fact that I can see those talons. The BG might be a tad oversharpened now that I am viewing from my desktop monitor.
    Marina Scarr
    Florida Master Naturalist
    Website, Facebook

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    1,376
    Threads
    213
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Stout View Post
    MIKE:

    A keeper for sure. Before looking at other folks comments, I was going to suggest a neutral density gradient over the top to darken the sky and show a little more detail there. This will also make the owl appear brighter, but as has been mentioned, I would lighten the owl just a bit selectively, crop a bit off bottom and right. I did a version with those changes when you first posted your image, and liked the result. I use Color Efex Detail extractor over the owl to make him pop just a bit from the foreground.

    For me I would def. leave the sky.



    Randy
    Randy if you havent deleted it would you post your version please ?
    Cheers

  9. #9
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,879
    Threads
    170
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Most definitely a keeper, Mike, and I like it a lot. I would definitely keep the sky and the trees.
    I love the habitat, the bird placement. The bird shows a blue cast on my monitor, but I haven't seen this bird so take it fwiw.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Pune, Maharashtra, India
    Posts
    7,409
    Threads
    469
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Magnificent GGO scape. Great environment, both warm and cool.Love the frame.
    Definitely keeper.

    Regards,
    Satish.

  11. #11
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Mike, I tried a few sunset images like this too recently...some that I like and may post. The sky should definitely remain here, but it could be toned down. I would crop away about half the FG, and not sharpen the cattails. I imagine you were with Marc...next time you are up here we may just cross paths!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics