Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ringed beak Gull In Flight

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Millington Md.
    Posts
    2,513
    Threads
    365
    Thank You Posts

    Default Ringed beak Gull In Flight

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Taken at Bombay Hook DE. I found a number of these gulls fishing the waters at Bombay. Is the black band too much of a distraction?

    Nikon D-800
    !/1250 sec at F8
    ISO 1000
    500 mm f4
    Comments welcome

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Marina Scarr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    10,347
    Threads
    403
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the composition and the bird against the environment. The gull really pops. Could you please tell me whether this is a big crop or whether you ran noise reduction on the bird b/c I am not seeing as many details in the gull as I would like and there is some halo around parts of the bird.
    Marina Scarr
    Florida Master Naturalist
    Website, Facebook

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Millington Md.
    Posts
    2,513
    Threads
    365
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Marina....yes it is probably cropped about 50 %.....because the D-800 is a 36 mp camera i thought I could get away with that.......I also ran noise reduction...perhaps too much! Thanks fro looking!

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas USA
    Posts
    1,819
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Bob. Instead of trying to figure out percentages, it is much more useful to deal in megapixels. If you use ACR the MP of the image/cropped image is shown bottom center. I've been shooting with 24 MP, and had a tendancy to crop too much as well, and crop percentages are notoriously hard to judge. In my experience down to 12 MP is a good target size, but lower and especially below 5 MP causes problems, even when downsized for the web.
    NR to the background is perfectly fine, but NR to the subject is much more problematic, and damages feather and other detail significantly. It is very important you do not underexpose your subject (ETTR best if possible), for noise occurs mainly in the darker parts of an image. It is also better to selectively appply NR, if you need it, only to the parts that need it. With the color range command (in CS) you can pick shadows, essentially the darker parts of an image, and then apply NR to that selection.
    It is a ring-billed gull. regards~Bill

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Marina Scarr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    10,347
    Threads
    403
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Based upon what you have told me, I think the problem lays with too much noise reduction on your subject. On a white subject you such as in this case, you probably did not need any noise reduction at all. Maybe just on the background.
    Marina Scarr
    Florida Master Naturalist
    Website, Facebook

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics