Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Red-tailed Hawk

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    155
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red-tailed Hawk

    Name:  8445361191_b3ce2daaea_z.jpg
Views: 96
Size:  239.2 KB

    Just trying to take the sharpest images I can. Took this at the Klamath Basin Wildlife Refuge last weekend. Rested the lens on a puffin pad on the car window ledge.

    Specs:
    Canon 7D, Sigma 50mm-500mm/ shot at 244mm
    Sunny Day
    ISO 100
    f/7.1
    1/200 sec

    I think the bg is a little busy but I am not sure how to fix that. Any suggestions or comments are welcome.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Euclid, Ohio
    Posts
    1,031
    Threads
    188
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The one thing you could try with the background is to put it on its own layer. A
    pply some gaussian blur to throw it a little out of focus.

    Because the sun doesn't seem to be at your back, the bird is in shadow. With
    your background on its own layer, return to the bird and try to brighten it a bit,
    but not to much, cause if you do, you'll start to see digital noise.

    He looks sharp, so I think its worth it to try what I suggested.

    Doug

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Trinidad & Tobago
    Posts
    329
    Threads
    17
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Allison - given that this was shot at 244mm, if you shot it at a longer focal length and turned the camera vertical to create a portrait, the BG would've had a higher degree of blurring. And it would've been less busy. Other than that, I echo Doug's valid points above. Very sharp shot.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Euclid, Ohio
    Posts
    1,031
    Threads
    188
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    **Disclaimer** This isn't meant to be even close to perfect, just wanted to show you
    Alison what you have to play with

    All I did was play with the Shadow/Highlight filter, gaus blurred the background and
    an itsy bitsy piece of sharpening. It kinda stinks cause I didn't take the time to put
    anything on its own layer and work that way. Like I said, just wanted to put something
    in your head on something to think about.

    I also used Faraaz's idea of going portrait.

    Name:  8445361191_b3ce2daaea_zz.jpg
Views: 53
Size:  174.0 KB

    Doug

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    44
    Threads
    3
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the shot, sharp and all to the twinkle in the eye. As others have said, background is a bit busy but still nice overall.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    155
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Faraaz. I did not think of that while shooting. It would have been the better way to go. Doug your version looks so much better. Thanks for taking the time to play with the image. I will do what you did and see if I can duplicate the effects. Thanks so much!

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Alison- I like the duotone look. Your subject is almost backlit so the it's in the shadow. The bird could be brightened like Doug has done. I would recommend using the Shadow and Blacks sliders in Adobe Camera Raw (if you shoot RAW!) to do this because you will be working on the RAW data which contains a tonne of information. You could also try using the centre slider in Levels and brighten up the mid-tones of the whole image. Blurring is one option for the BG but you could just use the dodge and burn tools to smooth out the tonality.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics