Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Kudu Bull

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default Kudu Bull

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Sorry Morkel, it's another herbivore. Taken on my recent trip to the Timbavati Game Reserve in South Africa.

    Canon 5D3
    70-200 II @ 160mm
    1/2000
    f5.6
    ISO 800
    EC +.67
    HH from safari vehicle, luminosity mask, levels, curves, selective color adjustments and sharpened in CS5.

    C&C welcome and appreciated. Thanks,

    Rachel

  2. #2
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,906
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel,
    pretty Kudu bull in the image . in his majestic way of walking, love that.
    Like the colors and the overall tonality, still there is more room for slight contrast move , for me.Nicely processed !!

    I would crop from RHS to get rid of that tree, is good for nothing in the image , for me.
    The only thing ,that makes this image less good,lets say less interesting is the fact that the Kudu is moving and/or looking away from us, so less ideal, i think.

    But just i repeat , very fine processing

    TFS Andreas

  3. #3
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel, a nice bull Kudu, lovely setting.

    We'll skip the colour as you know, however this looks well processed and I like the sheen on the antlers, albeit on the laptop. The red in the inner ear draws the eye and I like the side profile. From what I can see on the laptop, the light has created some good definition, form and structure illustrating how muscular and athletic these guys are and perhaps one of my favourite antelopes. A head on view will clearly show their lovely 'corkscrew' antlers. I think I would agree with Andreas about the tree, however you could then crop slightly tighter, not much as you have the IQ. Happy to go & trust Andreas's last word in his reply.

    What was the reason for the hi ish ISO and +0.67 comp?

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Andreas and Steve. Truthfully, I hadn't even noticed that tree but will look at a crop. The ISO and EC were because we had been shooting him in a more shaded area when he wandered out and across this open space. I just kept the settings as I fired off a few. I've also taken to ETTR a bit more.

    Thanks,
    Rachel

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks.

    I've also taken to ETTR a bit more.
    Can you expand, it's been a busy/long day with the Grouse.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Exposing To The Right

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cool, it's easier to darken than lighten and retrieve the detail.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer Tom Graham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Southern California, Orange County
    Posts
    1,116
    Threads
    33
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Cool, it's easier to darken than lighten and retrieve the detail.
    Not sure what you're saying Steve. Darken where/when? In camera exposure? Then "correct" in post processing? Or, ETTR then darken in PP?
    I lean toward darken in camera (little bit under exposed) because ETTR too often blows out highlights for me. But likely varies much by camera model, not even considering metering mode. Nothing beats knowing your equipment in different lighting situations.
    Oh, and image well processed, like environment grass, brush, trees. Would crop so rid of right tree. And would prefer slightly in front of Kudu rather than slightly behind.
    Tom
    Last edited by Tom Graham; 10-12-2012 at 06:12 PM.

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Tom - thanks for the comment on the image. Steve is agreeing with me, ETTR in the field (without blowing the highlights) and then darken in pp if necessary. If you underexpose and then brighten in pp then you are more likely to lose detail and to introduce noise, particularly in the darker areas.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,058
    Threads
    101
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    ETTR has paid of nicely Rachel. I like the setting and even though some would critise the head angle, it does show off the colours and detail in the ears.

    Jamie

  11. #11
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Rachel.

    Tom, certainly with the advancement of technology I personally am finding that the 1DX is giving me a better balanced exposure either side of the histogram and I can push things far more to the right with detail retained. Obviously you have to check the Histogram to ensure no blown whites, but the more you can push things to the right the more info you have to work with.

    BTW be great to see more of your images from your Africa trip.

    cheers
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  12. #12
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Jamie, much appreciated.

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    428
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great capture of a subject difficult to photograph.

    Can't add much to what has been mentioned above.

  14. #14
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Darnit, Rachel, I said no more herbivores ...
    Kudu are some of my favourite antelopes. Love the grace and confidence they exude.
    This one is no exception. I like the sense of place here, with the proud horns sitting nicely between the BG trees.
    ETTR sure worked
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  15. #15
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Russell and Morkel

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics