Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Kudu Bull

  1. #1
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default Kudu Bull

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Another experiment in my current mono-and-duotone series.
    Curious about your thoughts here. This wind-swept Kudu bull was photographed in the Kruger National Park in overcast gloomy weather.

    Techs:
    Nikon D7000 with Nikkor 500mm f4 VR-II + 1.4x TC @ 700mm
    f7.1 @ 1/1600 SS @ ISO-1600
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is drop-dead beautiful and the BG is perfect -- it complements without distracting. My only slight quibble would be that I miss seeing the whole animal -- it feels a little chopped off. That might be mitigated by a slightly light vignette on the bottom area of the chest, so it doesn't run into the bottom of the frame so abruptly. All the other edges appear subtly lighter.

    I'd love to see more of your series -- I'll check your web site in hopes of finding them there!

  3. Thanks Morkel Erasmus thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Morkel, why have you gone Mono, is it the BKG perhaps, just curious why you chose this route? Might help for feedback?

    The GS unless viewed in PS/CS does I feel, have a slight 'blue/selenium' tinge, but that is just the viewing in web. In converting the GS to RGB and then having an sRGB profile no change I can see.

    Personally I feel it lacks 'weight/presence', especially when you look back at your previous 'toned' images. The BKG I feel also clashes with the subject, but that perhaps is down to tone and being quite busy, having more tone/contrast in the subject my help separate it from the BKG, WDYT? Have you applied a vignette running along the foot of the image?

    I think the jury is out at present for me, only because of the previous images, but it will be interesting to see what others have to say, as the above is just my take.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  5. Thanks Morkel Erasmus thanked for this post
  6. #4
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Morkel - I like the windswept look and straight on stare of the kudu but as so often happens with kudu shots, the bg distracts a little bit for me with all the intersecting lines of the branches. The bg also appears a bit smudgy to me, most noticeable below the kudu's left ear and horn (right side as we look at it). I might also consider cropping a little more from the bottom of the image to where the kudu's rump begins to slope down. Not my favorite of the series but still a nice addition to it.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  7. Thanks Morkel Erasmus thanked for this post
  8. #5
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,906
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Morkel ,
    i like the bull standing in the wind facing the viewer.
    I like the contrast and the detail in the bull, but the issue here is the BG.Too busy, for my taste, think specially in B/W.

    I think the options for me are ,lighten the BG dramatically and darken the bull a tad more, but lighten the eyes.
    I would try to make a RP myself, but cannot sit for a longer time , had just a surgery yesterday and have some pain .

    Cheers Andreas

  9. Thanks Morkel Erasmus thanked for this post
  10. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    362
    Threads
    82
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    In my limited experience, Great Kudu are woodland antelope and it's rare to find them in open areas without bushes or trees behind. In this case I think you've achieved very good contrast with the BG, and the B&W helps. It's also an impressive bull, and I love the intent expression and the windswept feel. I share Diane's concern about the cropped animal, I think in cases like this a vertical frame with at least part of the legs showing works best - difficult with those massive horns though.

  11. Thanks Morkel Erasmus thanked for this post
  12. #7
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the pose, I think iso1600 with the D7000 is too much,
    another round of NR to smooth out the BG would look nice to me.
    I think the dead on stare is really good.
    Dan Kearl

  13. Thanks Morkel Erasmus thanked for this post
  14. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dankearl View Post
    I like the pose, I think iso1600 with the D7000 is too much,
    another round of NR to smooth out the BG would look nice to me.
    I think the dead on stare is really good.
    What I see in the BG is what I think is not so much noise, but heat wave distortion in the atmosphere. Not much can be done with it but embrace it.

  15. Thanks Morkel Erasmus thanked for this post
  16. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I have no misgivings on this image, I love it. I think the crop is fine as you have kept the balance of the composition, having legs included isn't necessary and would unbalance the image. I think the background works well as it makes the Kudu have some habitat without overpowering him. I think you may have reverse vignetted the top left over the horn a bit and I would bring back the density on the tip just a fraction (and if you didn't dodge it out, I would still burn it in at about 3%).

    I think the processing has given the image an ethereal look and feel which suits the windswept throat fringe. All subjective views of course, but it feels right … the balance, the light touch in processing, the composition. I could look at it for ages.

  17. Thanks Morkel Erasmus thanked for this post
  18. #10
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the varied feedback, folks. I am fine with the crop personally, and feel the BG is actually not intrusive or distracting as it's where they live and it's quite subdued. I did no blurring to the BG but I did process the kudu and BW separately when converting - focusing on different tones and contrasts.

    Dan, it's heat haze in the BG, the IQ on ISO-1600 on the D7000 is suprisingly good and if you expose correctly quite usable.

    Hilary - will look at that horntip! Sloppy me...
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics