Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Oak Titmouse Experiment

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Michael Gerald-Yamasaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA USA
    Posts
    2,035
    Threads
    311
    Thank You Posts

    Default Oak Titmouse Experiment

    Name:  _DSC5508-Edit.jpg
Views: 58
Size:  231.7 KB

    D4 300f/2.8 + TC20EIII (600mm) Manual f/5.6 1/640 ISO 640 (Underexposed by 2 stops) Handheld w/VR
    Lifted 2 stops in Raw Conversion in Capture NX2, cropped to 70% of original
    Topaz Denoise, Infocus, Adjust, sharpening

    Experimenting with underexposure for lower ISO & maintaining somewhat fast ss while counting on the sensor DR and low noise and a little help from pp tools.

    What do you think?

    Thanks for looking.

    Cheers,

    -Michael-

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Michael- You are a brave man- exposing to the LEFT!!!! I see the logic though and it is a neat experiment. I still see some noise in the BG (despite use of Denoise) and even some very subtle horizontal banding, which I didn't think Nikons were prone to. It would be useful to see a nominally exposed image to compare, or even one exposed to the right. Did you attempt the comparison?

  3. #3
    Richard Mc Donald
    Guest

    Default

    Along with your experiment Michael you've also lost some refinements in the shot by going hand held with a focal length of 600mm, pretty good chance you've lost that little bit extra with the x2 TC.

    Richard

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Michael Gerald-Yamasaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA USA
    Posts
    2,035
    Threads
    311
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Joh, Richard,

    Thanks much for the comments. I think I pushed the boundaries a bit too hard on this. Richard, yep, handholding 600mm at 1/640 f/5.6 is a bit of a gamble.

    I went back to the drawing board on this... As it turns out it was more than 2 stops, perhaps closer to 3, in processing push. The background didn't hold up. A challenge for very underexposed images is wb, and I went too hot by a fair margin.

    John, I rarely do comparisons... my standards for controlled experimentation is too high to actually do such ;-) I generally broadly shoot one way then another and see what I end up liking. On this shot I could have boosted ISO to 3200 or more, but even with the D4 there is a bit of a noise/fine feather detail trade off and I've wondered and am now playing with a low ISO - pp approach... I'll post another experiment shot.

    So anyway I pushed and prodded this one a different way:

    Name:  _DSC5508_2-Edit.jpg
Views: 33
Size:  176.4 KB

    Custom picture control in NX2 for flat 2 stop push, additional toning in Lab curves. Inreased NR & detailing.

    Cheers,

    -Michael-
    Last edited by Michael Gerald-Yamasaki; 09-29-2012 at 11:28 AM.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Michael.

    Good comment above. The image is soft, contains a bit too much noise and the background distracting. Agree with Richard 600MM HH is risky break out the tripod. Interesting concept but keeping the histogram in balance and spreading data over all 5 stops with normal exposure is what most pros do. But nothing wrong with some OOTB thinking too from time to time - keep em coming Michael - thanks for posting.
    Last edited by Jeff Cashdollar; 09-29-2012 at 08:29 PM.

  6. Thanks Michael Gerald-Yamasaki thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics