Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Dangling Bee

  1. #1
    BPN Member Bill Jobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,275
    Threads
    91
    Thank You Posts

    Default Dangling Bee

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I decided to experiment with the Nikon 300 2.8 as a macro instrument. Here I paired it with the Kenko 25mm extension tube and the D7000.

    This was hand-held, no flash.

    1/2000, F/3.5, +0.2 EV ISO 400.

    In hindsight, I notice that DOF would have likely been improved if I'd stopped down. I was trying to get maximum shutter speed, as it was hand-held, without increasing the ISO.

    Suggestions on the optimal F Stop under these conditions would be appreciated !
    Bill Jobes



    www.billjobes.com

    My BPN Gallery

    Walk Softly and Carry a Big Lens

  2. #2
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Bill as a matter of generality it is a good idea to be thinking in terms of f8-11-16 for fairly close macro say in the region of 1:3 give or take. In this case I suspect f8 would have been fine, had you been able to angle a little more from the left I think you would have had very good DOF and possibly even f5.6 to f8 would have worked, as it is it is still pretty good. The thing to remember DOF is related to magnification not necessarily to the lens - f8 at 1:3 with any lens will give the same DOF.
    You have good exposure and colours in the shot and it is a clean image. The only thing that I find negative is the bumble bee's rear end - just a little out of focus.

  3. #3
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Bill. With the smooth black abdomen and black wings, this looks like it might be an Eastern Carpenter Bee (Xylocopa virginica). You have good comp and background and the bee is giving you a nice pose. The issue is DOF, as you've already noted - you have good sharpness within your DOF and the image is not "bad" as presented, but more depth would notably improve it. Jon has some good advice above for you to try next time in the field.

  4. #4
    BPN Member Bill Jobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,275
    Threads
    91
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, Jonathan for the excellent advice on the F/Stop. I'll be trying that out as I head to the field.

    And thank you, Steve, for the super comments ! I'm sure you are correct on the Carpenter Bee I.D. I appreciate that a lot, knowing I struggle with the Bumble/Carpenter (for me) conundrum !
    Bill Jobes



    www.billjobes.com

    My BPN Gallery

    Walk Softly and Carry a Big Lens

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Millington Md.
    Posts
    2,513
    Threads
    365
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Bill....good sharpnes and pose on that bee. I agree you could have used f8 and 1/500 sec for more dof

  6. #6
    BPN Member Bill Jobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,275
    Threads
    91
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, Bob.
    Bill Jobes



    www.billjobes.com

    My BPN Gallery

    Walk Softly and Carry a Big Lens

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics