Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Bushtit

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    White Rock, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,047
    Threads
    262
    Thank You Posts

    Default Bushtit

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Decided to do a little backyard setup last night. light was fading but I liked the pose on this little bustit.
    Nikon D4, ISO 1000, -2/3 Ev, 1/640 @ F4, 500mm

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Newton MA, USA
    Posts
    1,956
    Threads
    144
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great pose indeed. Love the BG. If only the green branch was not there.
    In any case great image.

  3. #3
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Nice pose. IQ is not great - quite noisy and over-sharpened. Would re-process.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    793
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Roy
    Beautiful image of a twitchy tiny species.
    I like your setup- and just how did you force it to go into a heads down/tails up pose? Great use of limited DOF.
    Was there a Suet block below (that's what attracts the flocks to my feeders)?
    And I agree with Ofer about noise reduction and oversharpening
    Don

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,266
    Threads
    3,976
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Neat pose for sure, those don't lastlong so you timed yourself well...or got lucky on a burst :-) Love the forked tail here, and the vertical comp is very good. Perch is OK, but I must amit that in this particualr image the mossy clump is distracting IMO. I too see the noise and aggressive sharpening...worth tweaking.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member Marina Scarr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    10,347
    Threads
    403
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Absolutely killer pose and I really like your set up, moss and all. Agree on post processing issues mentioned above. I think this image can be vastly improved by starting from scratch.
    Marina Scarr
    Florida Master Naturalist
    Website, Facebook

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    White Rock, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,047
    Threads
    262
    Thank You Posts

    Default repost

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks for all your critiques. I honestly don't know about the noise at I blew the image up to 200% and there was no noise at all. Maybe when I saved it as a jpeg it did something. Anyway I've taken your suggestions with the repost, how do you like this? Minimal sharpening was added

  8. #8
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Repost looks much better when it comes to noise. Needs a tiny bit more sharpening and the cloning marks on the perch don't look good. I also see some posterization in the BG.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    White Rock, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,047
    Threads
    262
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Nelson View Post
    Roy
    Beautiful image of a twitchy tiny species.
    I like your setup- and just how did you force it to go into a heads down/tails up pose? Great use of limited DOF.
    Was there a Suet block below (that's what attracts the flocks to my feeders)?
    And I agree with Ofer about noise reduction and oversharpening
    Don
    Don, I put up a light stand with a perch to the right of a feeder that I had set up. Just luck getting the pose, it was just getting ready to hop down to the feeder.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Posts
    1,076
    Threads
    129
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ofer Levy View Post
    Repost looks much better when it comes to noise. Needs a tiny bit more sharpening and the cloning marks on the perch don't look good. I also see some posterization in the BG.
    Ofer sums up pretty much what I've gathered looking at this image. The image was over-sharpened before. I probably wouldn't have used F/4 at such close range; at a narrow f-stop and higher ISO (no problem at all with D4), you'd have had a sharper bushtit even before you began processing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics