Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Red banded hairstreak butterfly

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    71
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red banded hairstreak butterfly

    Red Banded Hairstreak... walking along the plant stem toward a new group of flowers.
    Model: NIKON D90
    ISO: 250
    Exposure: 1/320 sec
    Aperture: 20.0
    Focal Length: 150mm (Sigma)
    Flash - SB700 with diffusion dome

    Proceesed in NX2... mainly cropped, levels and curves and a little sharpening. Comments welcome

    [IMG] [/IMG]

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nicely done. I like the square on look with all the bits and pieces showing. Lovely bg as well. A bit cleaner perch would have been great but we don't often get a choice.
    I wonder if a bit more sharpening on the butterfly is called for.

  3. #3
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,030
    Threads
    2,606
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    What a beautiful little butterfly we don't get these in UK. Nicely exposed and focused. If possible I would have tried to take the image from slightly more round to the left, I think this would have improved presentation very slightly.
    A very minor criticism, there is a little artefact around the antennae due to sharpening and or noise reduction, I only mention it in case you untended to make a print.

  4. #4
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Linda. What a colorful little butterfly - and in very good shape too! The diffused flash worked well, I like the slight diagonal of the stem, and you have a good background. With a flat subject like this you could likely have gotten the whole butterfly within your DOF using f/16 or even f/11 - your lens will be sharper at these settings than at f/20, due to diffraction, and would render more detail in your subject (not that this is bad, as presented, but it could be even better! ) Just something to keep in mind the next time out. This is very nicely done!

  5. #5
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It would seem that the butterfly is angled slightly away from you and/or that there is a bit of motion blur as the face and the markings on the rear wing panel are sharper than the wings themselves. Are you on a tripod or hand holding? And how do you get a diffusion dome over a living butterfly?
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    71
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Arthur .. thank you. The butterfly was crawling slowly along the stem and I kept adjusting to try and achieve a good angle. I hoped it would stop a for a second but it never did. I was hand holding the camera as I haven't achieved a level of coordination of moving the camera on a tripod quickly enough before butterflies tend to fly off. I might have used the wrong term on diffusion... I was using the SB700 plastic attachment that covers the flash... Just a short history of my progress. I have been shooting with a DSLR since very late 2008 and for a couple of years used Nikon D50 for vacations, etc. In 2010 I tried some bird photography but I noticed a lot of butterflies in a patch of weeds in my yard and photographed a few. I moved up to a D90 and 85mm macro. In 2011, I really concentrated on trying to get the eye in focus and better exposure using flash. This year, I have been concentrating more on the background, getting the plane of focus correct and post processing (NX2). I really splurged this year and got the Sigma 150mm macro VR, the NIKON 300MM that is on my other camera and the SB700 flash. And I registered here a couple of months ago to get advice. Your observations are appreciated... I haven't quite learned to see the evidence in the final image that you can see in both this image and the long-tailed skipper you commented on.

  7. #7
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    YAW Linda. I would say that if you are doing macro hand held with natural light and not using flash as main light you need to learn to work on a tripod. Both of your images that I reviewed have serious sharpness issues :).
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics