Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Composition Critique

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    428
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default Composition Critique

    Took this image last year, and would appreciate your thoughts.

    I have a similar shot taken vertically, though would be interested to see how you feel this composition works? I appreciate that the subject is dead centre, yet I don't feel this detracts from it.

    Canon 1D Mark IV
    70-200 @70mm
    1/1250 @4.5
    ISO 640.

    Any other crit welcome.


    Name:  _T8C8569-as-Smart-Object-1.jpg
Views: 131
Size:  214.3 KB

  2. #2
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Russell is this FF, or cropped, if it has is it worth posting the FF version?

    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  3. #3
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Russell,

    I think the composition works OK, it is in your face which is what it should be.

    On my monitor it looks a little light. Do you have a little more at the bottom?

    Is this from the sighting which resulted in Alwyn getting told off for allowing you out of the car?

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    428
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi Russell is this FF, or cropped, if it has is it worth posting the FF version?

    Steve
    This is FF. My other version was actually shot vertically a few frames later.
    Last edited by Russell Johnson; 08-05-2012 at 08:12 AM.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    428
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Watkins View Post
    Russell,

    I think the composition works OK, it is in your face which is what it should be.

    On my monitor it looks a little light. Do you have a little more at the bottom?

    Is this from the sighting which resulted in Alwyn getting told off for allowing you out of the car?
    Thanks, Ken. I have one last curves adjustment that I disabled before posting, as I felt the image was a little dark. Will probably take another look.

    The telling off only came after we submitted a 4 page compliant letter about our stay at LK, which is a whole other story.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    428
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A quick repost with a curves adjustment (luminosity Blend) to the whole image except the nose and darks on the eyes.

    Name:  _T8C8569-as-Smart-Object-3.jpg
Views: 124
Size:  215.2 KB



  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Russell thanks for that.

    I think it does work as presented, I think it could also work coming in from the RHS, perhaps avoiding, or cutting through the tree in the BKG, pushing things slightly off centre? Was the image/subject backlit and did you 'double process' the file, as I get the impression the face looks a little noisy for the ISO? Compared to your previous posting the image does look a little thin and could do with 'beefing up' Russell. Took the liberty Russell.

    Looks like we overlapped in posting.

    The telling off only came after we submitted a 4 page compliant letter about our stay at LK, which is a whole other story.
    Guys this really has no relevance to the thread and therefore please keep future comments to the Critiquing of the image, if you wish to discuss this further then please exchange by PM or email, thank you.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  8. Thanks Russell Johnson thanked for this post
  9. #8
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Russell, I think somewhere between your RP and mine?
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  10. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    428
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi Russell thanks for that.

    I think it does work as presented, I think it could also work coming in from the RHS, perhaps avoiding, or cutting through the tree in the BKG, pushing things slightly off centre? Was the image/subject backlit and did you 'double process' the file, as I get the impression the face looks a little noisy for the ISO? Compared to your previous posting the image does look a little thin and could do with 'beefing up' Russell. Took the liberty Russell.

    Looks like we overlapped in posting.
    .
    Thanks, Steve. There light source was from the side, and I double processed the image to give a warmer feel to the shadows.

    I have applied more NR to the face, and that seems to have done the trick, I had only applied it minimally to start.

  11. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    428
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Russell, I think somewhere between your RP and mine?
    Agreed :)

  12. #11
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post




    Guys this really has no relevance to the thread and therefore please keep future comments to the Critiquing of the image, if you wish to discuss this further then please exchange by PM or email, thank you.
    Can I ask if this sort of comment is applied equally to all those who post comments which some consider to be off topic. I believe that establishing details of the sighting is fairly important and this is how it was described amongst those with knowledge of it. Sorry if it has offended you.

    The re-posts are both still wide of the mark as far as I am concerned I still think Russel's needs to be darker, but he was there and only he can decide.

  13. #12
    BPN Member Andre van As's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    West Chester, PA, (summer), Florida (winter)
    Posts
    104
    Threads
    10
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Russel
    The power of your image is in the cheetah's eyes therefore I would portray this image as an isolated head shot and get rid of all of the other surrounding distractions. There is a lot of noisy distraction in the sky the the left and above; the legs and feet are not visible; the horizon cuts the subject in half. So get rid of all of these elements. I did a rough edit on your image - still needs more work. There may not be enough resolution left to achieve what I suggest. I am used to working with 50MP images so I have a lot more cropping latitude.

    Best regards

    AndreName:  _Cheetah Russel image cropped.jpg
Views: 120
Size:  66.3 KB

  14. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    428
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andre van As View Post
    Hi Russel
    The power of your image is in the cheetah's eyes therefore I would portray this image as an isolated head shot and get rid of all of the other surrounding distractions. There is a lot of noisy distraction in the sky the the left and above; the legs and feet are not visible; the horizon cuts the subject in half. So get rid of all of these elements. I did a rough edit on your image - still needs more work. There may not be enough resolution left to achieve what I suggest. I am used to working with 50MP images so I have a lot more cropping latitude.

    Best regards

    AndreName:  _Cheetah Russel image cropped.jpg
Views: 120
Size:  66.3 KB
    0

    Thanks Andre, I have tighter crops and images in vertical. As I have mentioned on the forum before, I feel that you need the foreground portray the shooting angle.

    Was just trying work a different image perspective.

  15. #14
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Russell, I think the central composition works well but it feels a bit like an image which has had too much shadow highlight adjustment. It would be hard to make adjustments further on your posting.

    Guys this really has no relevance to the thread and therefore please keep future comments to the Critiquing of the image, if you wish to discuss this further then please exchange by PM or email, thank you.
    Just one comment re this … many threads go off topic quite happily except when it is controversial so I think there should be one rule followed by everyone including moderators.

    HOWEVER, it upsets me greatly that if evidence of a photographer not behaving appropriately (not saying that it happened here), whether by his own demands or by the guide pushing boundaries, that we all as collective wildlife photographers should choose to ignore the behaviour because we want to make congratulatory remarks on the final quality of the image. The ends do not justify the means and I think that it should be part of the critiquing process. If a photographer intrudes, or we suspect that it may be the case, on a wild animal's space, causes them undue distress, puts their safety at risk, then it should be criticised as much as the IQ or composition. I think we should make a stand against the increasing unethical behaviour shown by photographers around wildlife.

    That is my view.

  16. #15
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    PS, not taking a shot at anyone on this thread, by the way, just saying that we need to be seen as being proactive in defence of the very fine proponents of wildlife photography who do everything in their power to get artistic and excellent photos without behaving badly. If it gets put in the General Discussion, it doesn't address the critiquing of the image where the problem may be an issue and it gets buried.

  17. #16
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Apart from the fall in IQ (inevitable given the small file he had to work with) the crop by Andre gives a whole new perspective and certainly strengthens the subject, for me it is just a little too tight.

    Interesting that there are few comments on his suggestion so far.

    Hilary,

    Given the fact that some are constantly suggesting getting out of the vehicle to avoid the "look down" look and do not get criticised for it then I think a thread in general discussion would be great, over to you.

    PS I think it is only to fair to omit places like Mana Pools where it is thankfully allowed

  18. #17
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I have started a topic in general http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...221#post827221

    As far as the close up crop is concerned, I'm not convinced. It is an alternative for sure, but loses something from the original which may be an environmental feel.

  19. #18
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    428
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Before Ken or omeone else gets their knickers in a twist, they should understand the context of the sighting:

    1) No rules were broken, as walking is permitted in this area. I was under instruction from someone who has walked and guided in the delta for over 15 years.
    2) There is a walking camp in the same area. Footsteps regularly approach tthis wildlife on foot, which is one reason why they are habituated.
    3) We parked got out of the vehicle arOund 30 metres from the Cheetah, and did not approach them. It was their decision to move closer.
    4) we were the only vehicle at the sighting, and the guide and I have a rule that this should not be done with another party present and potentially detract form their game viewing.
    5) I would suggest that you contact the guide in question about any telling off. As Ken is certainly portraying it a different light to my involvement in the discussion. This happened 4 months after he incident and was only raised following complaints about the poor standard of service provided by the company concerned.
    6) There have a numerous occasions where upon asking the guided to leave the vehicle they have said no.

    I do raise the shooting angle as a crit. As I said before to you Ken, good perspectives do not require you to get out of vehicle, it can also be achieved through better field craft when positioning the vehicle or how you sit in the car. I would be more than happy to provide you with examples that I have written in an e-book.
    Last edited by Russell Johnson; 08-06-2012 at 02:47 AM.

  20. #19
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Russell,
    You fully know that the circumstances of this sighting were related to me by an old friend your guide, you also know that I am fully aware that walking is practised in this concession, so I do not have any idea why you are asserting that I am "portraying it in a different light".
    It is hardly my fault that other people may have misinterpreted, either my question or your response. Nevertheless the discussion suggested by Hilary is totally valid, I am aware as you probably are that many people abuse the sujects of their photography purely for self publicity.

    My knickers remain totally untwisted

    Thanks for your offer of education, but I think I have enough allready.

    As this is now getting totally off piste, I believe that having expanded on your comment, purely in self defense, that further comments on photographic should be restricted to the thread started by Hilary.

  21. #20
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Africa
    Posts
    3,723
    Threads
    251
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the original crop...i like the balance and the view of the surroundings, colors do look washed out and the IQ is not great as i see noise in the subject...Think a bit of contrast and sat increase but I see some have addressed those issues already....Nice image design!

  22. #21
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Love the POV here Russel.
    The eyes are really compelling, and I don't mind the centred placement of your OP. Hilary's made a good point that the OP looks like it was overtreated with S/H adjustments......would be interested in seeing the straight-from-RAW-jpg for comparison?

    Will weigh in on the ethics thread when I have more time. Baby calling!
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  23. #22
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Morkel,

    Before this thread went slightly pear shaped, I think I commented on the lightness in pane 3, whether that is from S/H I have no idea.

    It makes a nice change to agree on brightness

    I would also like to see a straight from Raw, basically to test out the possibilities of a smaller crop, IQ allowing.

    Good luck with the baby!

  24. #23
    BPN Viewer Tom Graham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Southern California, Orange County
    Posts
    1,116
    Threads
    33
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    To me, in the original framing and all reposts the BG looks artificial. Also seeing all four legs like that, lined up across 1-2-3-4, looks very strange, to me.
    Tom

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics