Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Shooting in the Dark at iso 6400.

  1. #1
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default Shooting in the Dark at iso 6400.

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Just for a challenge, I went to the Osprey nest at 7:30 this evening in dark, mostly overcast conditions just to test the autofocus of the D800 and
    also to see if I could get a decent flight shot in really dark conditions. It doesn't appear that dark but this is at ISO 6400.
    The whites are a bit blown, almost impossible to get right shooting against a dark BG in light like this.
    Just an experiment, not great IQ, I would not shoot in this light again, but I thought I post it to show
    what these new generation camera's are capable of.
    This is also a 50% crop.
    NR on BG only, none on the Osprey.

    1/1000, f5, iso6400, 500mm (300f2.8 w/ 1.7 tc), HH, D800



    DSC_1860.jpg
    Last edited by dankearl; 07-18-2012 at 11:59 PM.
    Dan Kearl

  2. #2
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Dan, I wonder why you say the following: "The whites are a bit blown, almost impossible to get right shooting against a dark BG in light like this." ?
    If you expose manually according to the whites you should not have any problem.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,812
    Threads
    180
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Pretty impressive at such very high ISO Dan, not too shabby really

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Dan - you're really enjoying that D800. Impressive results too.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  5. #5
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The bird is amazingly noise-free for that ISO. Nice bg, too. I might have wished for a cleaner head profile, but I realize this was an experiment to add to your great Osprey files.

  6. #6
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    looks good for ISO 6400 and a 50% crop. BG is nice and the pose is good too with good eye contact. there is a slight magenta cast on the whites.

    I wish the beak had not merged with the far wing. I agree with Ofer head whites seem too hot. you should be able to nail the whites with manual exposure. just constantly check your histogram and make sure you dial down the exposure as needed. Osprey whites is indeed a tricky subject but I'm sure you can nail it eventually.
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member gail bisson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    12,731
    Threads
    910
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Pretty cool for an ISO of 6400.
    TFS
    Gail

  8. #8
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the comments on this, I probably should have posted it to the photography discussion forum as the 6400 iso IQ is not really great.
    Ofer and Arash, I used manual settings and I pushed it way to the right on purpose as I thought that exposing for the whites would have
    caused the noise to get really bad on the dark part of the bird and the dark BG, so I overexposed.
    Maybe not correct?, but in this situation I thought that was the way to go.
    Dan Kearl

  9. #9
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hey Dan I would not overexpose with any camera. Saturated whites cannot be recovered but noise can be removed with good processing and that is where D800 shines.
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Lake Oswego, OR
    Posts
    641
    Threads
    59
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dan,

    I agree with your push to the right as much as possible. It is easy to go to far with an osprey but you do not want to be too dark especially at that ISO. I think it looks remarkably good.

  11. #11
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Dan, the way I see things - blown whites send the shot to the bin whereas you can deal with noise in most cases. I never check the histogram - I only check the highlights alert and open the aperture one third of a stop below blowing the highlights. Works perfectly well, no issues with exposure or noise. Having said that I never shoot birds in very high ISO as I don't see the point.

  12. #12
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Dan, pretty good IQ for your high ISO, and I would be happy with this result. I like the BG, and agree, there is a slight magenta cast.

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    793
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice one Dan!
    I agree with the magenta cast - but this is easy to fix.

  14. #14
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bedford, MA
    Posts
    1,603
    Threads
    302
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ofer Levy View Post
    I never check the histogram - I only check the highlights alert and open the aperture one third of a stop below blowing the highlights.
    Hi Ofer,

    I can't argue with your results as I have never seen anything but perfectly exposed images from you but it can be a bit dangerous to rely solely on the highlight alerts, especially with Canon cameras.

    Canon's highlight alerts are based on luminance or "perceived brightness" which takes into account the sensitivity of the human vision vision system to various colors.
    The luminance of a pixel is computed from its RGB values using a weighted formula. The most often quoted formula is (0.3 * R) + (0.59 * G) + (0.11 * B).

    Because the formula is so heavily weighted toward green, you can, for example, have lots of pixels with the red channel blown yet their luminance will not reach the point where highlight alerts will be triggered.
    This can be a real issue when photographing subjects in very warm light or subjects with intense reds. Your camera's single color histogram (based on luminance) can look fine and you can have no blinkies at all
    but when you look at the histogram for the individual RGB channels, you may see that there are clearly pixels with blown red channels.

    Take any image into Photoshop, add a patch of pure red, and then choose "Luminosity" from the Channel drop down in the histogram window and you will likely not see any spikes on the right side.
    However, if you enable the "All Channels" view, you will see an obvious spike in the red channel.

    Nikon provides a "workaround" to this issue on most of their DSLRs with their "Highlights" display mode which will give you blinkies when any ONE of the individual color channels is blown.
    Hopefully, Canon will eventually follow suit, but as far as I can tell from the 1DX manual, nothing has been changed in this regard.
    So, for now, Canon users should set their default Histogram type to RGB (rather than Brightness) and keep an eye on the red channel in warm light or when photographing subjects with intense reds.

  15. #15
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I also use the highlight alert as opposed to histogram. It has been working well for me. The RGB histogram in Canon cameras is too small, if only a small area is blow it will not show in the histogram so it's not very useful IMO.

    Q for Mike, do you have a reference from Canon that indicates they use such formula or is it just something that has been said on the net?
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  16. #16
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bedford, MA
    Posts
    1,603
    Threads
    302
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arash_hazeghi View Post
    Q for Mike, do you have a reference from Canon that indicates they use such formula or is it just something that has been said on the net?
    Hi Arash,

    I first came across the concept of Luminance (also referred to as Luminosity or Brightness) vs. Individual Color Channel histograms in the Cambridge in Colour tutorials on the subject :

    http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tut...istograms1.htm
    http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tut...istograms2.htm

    Then I found this article and performed the tests described long ago on my 1D Mk II which verified the results :

    http://www.brisk.org.uk/photog/hiblow1.html

    But the real proof is that I have seen it in the field on numerous occasions with the Mk II, Mk III, and now the Mk IV (e.g. with white bird at sunset), where the Brightness histogram had no indication of any values anywhere near the right side and there were no blinkies, yet an examination of the individual RGB histograms showed that the Red channel was clearly and badly blown.

    You can see an example of such a situation on page 2 of this Canon web page :

    http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resou...stograms.shtml

    by clicking on the phrase "there are instances where it can be useful to view a graph of all three color channels"

  17. Thanks Sidharth Kodikal thanked for this post
  18. #17
    Ofer Levy
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Mike, thank you for the excellent information. I wasn't aware of this limitation of the Canon system although I have noticed this issue in the field so acted accordingly - when shooting in very warm light and/or birds with red parts I am more careful and expose a bit less than what the highlights alert allows me.

  19. #18
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Mike too bad the blinkies are only based on weighted luminance. I hope they can provide a full screen RGB histogram like Nikon cameras.
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics