Stumbled upon this flckr gallery:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/3833757...7622819808778/
Not sure how he did it or even if the birds actually "pressed" the shutter button :)
Doesn't seem to be that difficult :D:D
Printable View
Stumbled upon this flckr gallery:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/3833757...7622819808778/
Not sure how he did it or even if the birds actually "pressed" the shutter button :)
Doesn't seem to be that difficult :D:D
And that doesn't include the 55 images in his hummer collection !!!
Nice work Roy if you get to see this page.
Here is another great flickr BIF photographer also in Canada:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tinyfis...7600602648350/
Cheers: Ian Mc
I´m pretty sure that he use birdfeeder and 2 flash setup to catpure the birds! I have tried it m my self! The birds often fly to the same branch and then to the feeder!Quote:
Originally Posted by Desmond Chan
Here is my 2 expemples! Little to much flash but i got them:)
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/...n%C3%B6tis.jpg
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/...n%C3%B6tis.jpg
I've managed a few hummers with flash that froze them pretty well. Nothing else though. I tried using "trap focus" around the feeder but the birds are just too fast for the AF. Seems by the time the camera thought they where in focus and tripped the shutter they weren't. )-:}
Best luck I've had was using a small aperture with a remote flash on my old Nikon D50.
HERE
Looks to me like most of the shots are very noisey, which probably means very high ISO's and/or heavy crops, maybe a hint of the techniques used along with multi strobe (on some shots). Very nice collections!
Do note that hummer shots are relatively easy if you have a feeder or flowers up. All you have to do is prefocus, and anticipate their behavioral patterns. Songbirds are trickier as they don't hover, but the same principles still apply
Agreed. Hummers hover, when they do, they're as good as sitting still. No flash needed...well, perhaps unless you want other poses :D Songbirds landing shots are not as difficult as their take-off and free flight shots. Their take-off is too fast, pretty much invisible, and their flight time is too shot to get a focus lock on. Not to mention they're small birds to begin with and they usually don't fly where you'd get a clean background.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aidan Briggs
As far as I can see, the image quality could be better (some exposure look pretty bad). Still, an impressive collection.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Brown
Saw that, too. I think NSN has a "tinyfish" posting there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian McHenry
Sorry. What's NSN ?
Naturescapes.netQuote:
Originally Posted by Ian McHenry
Des, to answer the title question, I think most do not shoot small BIF is because with most lenses that you are able to handhold up even to the 500 a small bird is not going to fill the frame and will require a large crop. When you make a large crop you might get you crop slapped!! :)
Jay "Crop Slapped" very funny!! They could also use extension tubes with a long lens.
Les Campbell who lives in Massachusetts out near the Quabbin Reservoir was doing this over 30 years ago with slide film. Image that!
I have not seen Les in many years now, I would guess he's in his 80's by now.
His photography would BLOW YOU AWAY! A true master if there ever was one.
