ISO 12800 http://imaging.nikon.com/products/im...g/pic_006b.jpg
ISO 6400 http://imaging.nikon.com/products/im...g/pic_001b.jpg
I like the fact that the light is less than ideal in these samples.
Printable View
ISO 12800 http://imaging.nikon.com/products/im...g/pic_006b.jpg
ISO 6400 http://imaging.nikon.com/products/im...g/pic_001b.jpg
I like the fact that the light is less than ideal in these samples.
A better way to check noise or, if that's the case, the lack of it, IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by James Shadle
Here's some more:
http://imaging.nikon.com/products/im...d3s/sample.htm
The sensor size has gone from 5.94 to 8.45 um.
No wonder the noise is way down:
http://imaging.nikon.com/products/im...image_quality/
Really smart move by Nikon, I love the low light images.
Comparing D3s to D3 would make more sense wrt to pixel size and noise. D3(s) and D3x are different tools for different jobs IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ilija Dukovski
Yes, you are right. The pixel size seems same as in D3.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Whitehead
Not enough reason to get me to upgrade from my D3 Im afraid.
dont really want video and the rest is just minor upgrades IMHO - Will wait for the next Gen IE: D4 series.
Personally dont know if we will see a D700X.
IR website has posted some high ISO samples
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D3S/D3SA7.HTM
ISO 102,400 is usable for emergency small web posts
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...rig_102400.HTM
Impressive.
Lots of banding in the 102400 - but still pretty amazing :)Quote:
Originally Posted by arash_hazeghi
Yeah, Nikon didn't lie it is really better than D3/D700, hard to believe, the 12,800 shots are now very usable!Quote:
Originally Posted by Lance Peters
