400mm/5.6L +1.4x vs. 300/2.8IS L + 2x?
I currently use a 300/2.8L IS with both 1.4x and 2x TCs for BIF with my newly acquired Mk3. I also use a 40D. Focus acquisition with the 300+2x combination has become better with the Mk3 as opposed to the 40D but it's still lacking. A fellow photographer mentioned that I should try the 400 f5.6 + the 1.4x. I realize that I'll lose a full stop and IS... I can probably rent one to try it out but figured I'd ask here on the forum before I go to the expense.
Good idea? Waste of time and money? Look forward to hearing your thoughts...