Could the new 400 DO II can fully replace a 100-400 II and a 300/2.8 I ? Travel / BiF !!
I am loud thinking here and ask you for a little help:
would it be an effective replacement for my lenses, the 400 DO II
Now i have these lenses:
100-400 II
300mm/2.8L IS 1. Version
600/4L IS II (out of Discussion)
i also have both new TC`s the 1.4x III and the 2x T III.
Bodies: 7D2 , 5DsR and my mainbody is the 1DX..
longterm thinking i will replace it with an 1DX II and i think the upcoming 5DMark IV, but it will take a little time
Both lenses are very good, fast and i like to shot with them.
The 100-400 II is my travel and walk around lens good for bif , even with the 1.4 TC on very sharp
but i am most of the time at 400mm
the 300/2.8 was my first dream telelens for years, so i bought me this dream a few years ago. :2eyes2:
but i dont use it very often. 300mm is most of the time too short, converter with 1.4 on is very good.. but then i take more the 100-400 II with me, because it is lighter !
i do not need the f:2.8 often, ok its nice to have
is it a great lens, everytime when i use i, it gives me a smile on my face, it is sharp with both converters, even at 600/5.6.
ok with the 7D2 und the 5D it becomes slower at 600mm but still faster than a tamron 150-600. :t3
+but most of the time i am using the 600/4 (also freehand) and the 100-400 II (50% 600mm -including 840mm or 1200mm- 40% the 100-400II mostly at 400mm or near, 10% Rest)
I really like to shoot Birds in Flight, moving subjects and i am travelling a lot (in europe), ok i also like to shoot mammals or shorebirds on the ground with very often 840mm, so also the quality of the 400DO IS II with the 2xTC III wide open at f:8 is important for me!
long story sorry for that... :c3:
Is the new 400 DO II a really good replacement for these two lenses for me in my situation , this is my question !??
Thank you !