Canon 300 f4.0L vs 400 f5.6lL
I know these aren't the big lens that you guys have to play with, but I'm pretty young and just starting out as a hobbyist so I can't afford anything bigger at the moment.
I am torn between the 400 or the 300 f4.0L IS with 1.4x TC.
Wondering if anyone has any experience with either of these lens or possibly both.
My understanding is the 400 will not AF with a TC, and that the 300 is very slow AF compared to 400 specially for BIF. IF the 300 was faster I think it would be a no brainer since the 300 with 1.4x TC gives you 420 @ 5.6 while also offering IS.
I have found both used and in great condition, 400 for $900 and the 300 for $1200.
any input would be helpful.
Thanks.