P-A. Fortin
01-22-2012, 09:47 PM
Yeah I know, I had the same reaction first: 1000$ is not enough.
But here's the situation: I have a friend whose girlfriend is interested in bird photography due to my bad influence. She currently has a not-so-good point and shoot camera with a 12x zoom and not much knowledge of the "techs" of photography yet. But she has the interest and is starting to put some time into it.
My friend would like to get her a camera as a gift when she completes her master's degree, but he has a limited budget of ~1000$ (CAN) and asked me for advice. My first reaction was to think that it made no sense, that my 60D/100-400 combo was just the minimal limit that allowed to make images just above the level of "awful" and that it would be a waste of money otherwise.
Then I calmed down and realized that I might have turned a bit rough in my critics of images/gear over the last year :bg3:
I started to think and look around. It seems obvious to me that, considering her current skills, putting a 60D/7D-like body in her hands would probably be a waste and might in fact be so complicated that it might scare her away. Might not be a good starting point. It also seemed obvious to me that lenses of 400mm+ were out of question due to the budget limit.
So I wondered about what would be, taking budget into account, the best possible kit that might allow her to learn and work for a few years without reaching the limits too quickly, which might result into more frustration than fun.
At this point, I was leaning toward the Canon T2i/550D combined with the Tamron 70-300mm. I considered the Canon 70-300 (not the L version), but the price is significantly higher than the Tamron, and the reviews I have read lead me to believe that she would not notice much difference anyway. I also considered the Nikon version, but the comments I read were that the AF speed was lower than the other 2 lenses. Image quality difference, she might not notice. AF speed however is something she would likely notice quickly so I would put that as a main spec to look for.
If anyone has comments on this possible combo, other possible options, experience with this equipment, etc... please share. I'd like to suggest my friend something that would at least last a few years, while having a learning curve that would not be too harsh and yet allow to make some decent photos/souvenirs (no publishing in sight here obviously :))
Thanks.
But here's the situation: I have a friend whose girlfriend is interested in bird photography due to my bad influence. She currently has a not-so-good point and shoot camera with a 12x zoom and not much knowledge of the "techs" of photography yet. But she has the interest and is starting to put some time into it.
My friend would like to get her a camera as a gift when she completes her master's degree, but he has a limited budget of ~1000$ (CAN) and asked me for advice. My first reaction was to think that it made no sense, that my 60D/100-400 combo was just the minimal limit that allowed to make images just above the level of "awful" and that it would be a waste of money otherwise.
Then I calmed down and realized that I might have turned a bit rough in my critics of images/gear over the last year :bg3:
I started to think and look around. It seems obvious to me that, considering her current skills, putting a 60D/7D-like body in her hands would probably be a waste and might in fact be so complicated that it might scare her away. Might not be a good starting point. It also seemed obvious to me that lenses of 400mm+ were out of question due to the budget limit.
So I wondered about what would be, taking budget into account, the best possible kit that might allow her to learn and work for a few years without reaching the limits too quickly, which might result into more frustration than fun.
At this point, I was leaning toward the Canon T2i/550D combined with the Tamron 70-300mm. I considered the Canon 70-300 (not the L version), but the price is significantly higher than the Tamron, and the reviews I have read lead me to believe that she would not notice much difference anyway. I also considered the Nikon version, but the comments I read were that the AF speed was lower than the other 2 lenses. Image quality difference, she might not notice. AF speed however is something she would likely notice quickly so I would put that as a main spec to look for.
If anyone has comments on this possible combo, other possible options, experience with this equipment, etc... please share. I'd like to suggest my friend something that would at least last a few years, while having a learning curve that would not be too harsh and yet allow to make some decent photos/souvenirs (no publishing in sight here obviously :))
Thanks.