View Full Version : Furnace Falls - vertical version
Andrew McLachlan
10-29-2010, 03:23 PM
81163
Here is the vertical version to the previously posted Furnace Falls on the Irondale River in Ontario's Haliburton Highlands.
I have one other vertical version that excludes the two birch trees on the right, less clouds above the tree and no rocks in the lower left corner, but I think this works better with the wider view.
Nikon D200
12-24mm lens at 12mm (effective focal length 18mm
f22 @ 3.6 sec
ISO 100
Look forward to comments on this version.
Dave Mills
10-29-2010, 10:05 PM
Hi Andrew,I like this version with the inclusion of a foreground. The water,while silky has detail. The bare tree on the left has even become more dominant which I like. I might take out the mostly cut tree on the rt (or add more of it)and bring the sky down a bit since it's not contributing much to the overall....
Andrew McLachlan
10-29-2010, 10:16 PM
Thanks Dave for the comments. I was going to clone out the cut tree on the right, but thought I would leave it as is for now and see what folks think. Much appreciate your comments.
Judy Howle
10-30-2010, 11:52 AM
I like the image's colors and water flow, and the composition but I also think that cloning out the top of the tree on the right and removing some of the sky would improve it.
Roman Kurywczak
10-30-2010, 06:24 PM
Hey Andrew,
I think this view is stronger and I do like the FG you included. Agree with right tree too but I am OK with the sky as presented. Nicely done overall!
Andrew McLachlan
10-30-2010, 06:43 PM
Thanks to all for the comments. Much appreciated. I have cloned the tree out as my final step in optimizing this one.
Robert Amoruso
11-01-2010, 08:16 AM
Andrew,
I am liking the vertical best and agree with the other comments. Nice work.
Andrew McLachlan
11-01-2010, 04:38 PM
Thanks for the comments Robert, much appreciated.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.