Norm Dulak
10-18-2010, 02:55 PM
In a previous thread I considered whether the new Nikkor 28-300mm vrII lens might be an excellent choice of a lens to take on a photographic excursion to Antarctica. The purported quality build, sharpness, dramatic zoom range and reasonable size and weight of the lens all suggested that the lens was a winner for my purposes. And that still may be the case.
So I went ahead and purchased one of the lenses, tested its sharpness in a fairly primitive way, posted my results on another BPN thread, and contemplated acquiring a second 28-300mm lens for my Antarctica trip. But a recent comprehensive review of the lens at http://mansurovs.com/nikon-28-300mm-vr-review#more-12066 suggests that the lens may present difficulties or limitations that I hadn't anticipated. :o
As a consequence, I may reconsider a suggestion that I look at the Nikkor 70-300mm lens, as a second lens for my trip.
Many thanks to all of you who commented and offered your sage advice in my previous threads on this subject. And I can assure you that any further comments you may make will be welcomed!
Norm
So I went ahead and purchased one of the lenses, tested its sharpness in a fairly primitive way, posted my results on another BPN thread, and contemplated acquiring a second 28-300mm lens for my Antarctica trip. But a recent comprehensive review of the lens at http://mansurovs.com/nikon-28-300mm-vr-review#more-12066 suggests that the lens may present difficulties or limitations that I hadn't anticipated. :o
As a consequence, I may reconsider a suggestion that I look at the Nikkor 70-300mm lens, as a second lens for my trip.
Many thanks to all of you who commented and offered your sage advice in my previous threads on this subject. And I can assure you that any further comments you may make will be welcomed!
Norm