PDA

View Full Version : Cosmos



Anita Bower
07-29-2010, 05:24 AM
Nikon D300, Sigma 105mm macro 2.8, f32, 6 sec., ISO 160, manual focus (live view), manual exposure, tripod, indoors, natural light, foam board BG. PP: PS7, only basic adjustments, crop, added border.

I think there is too much negative space for the size of the flowers. I plan to experiment with adding a texture to add interest to the negative space, but unfortunately I won't be able to post the resulting image here. Not sure I like the border.

denise ippolito
07-29-2010, 06:53 AM
Anita, I love the image design. Is there a slight blue cast on the flowers? I'm not sold on the border either. That said I love the negative space and the white BG is pleasing.

Ken Childs
07-29-2010, 08:57 AM
Anita, the flowers look great but I think I'd like a different crop. Something starting at about where the 3 stems join together and adding a sliver to the top and the left would be about right.

I'm also not thrilled with the border. :)

Julie Kenward
07-29-2010, 09:46 AM
Looking at the crop I like the inclusion of the stuff at the bottom. Maybe a longer piece of stem below that and an even more vertical crop? I do like the way the flowers play off each other and the spatial relationship between the two. I do think with all this white BG you need a border but maybe something thinner or softer would work better? If you do add a texture to this I'd definitely remove the border for sure.

Anita Bower
07-29-2010, 09:50 AM
Denise: There was a blue cast, which I've tried to remove.
Ken: I cropped as suggested, and like it better, but miss the bit at the bottom.
Jules: I think I have a vertical of this; will try working on it.
All: No border.
THANKS.:D

Matthew Pugh
07-29-2010, 10:09 AM
Hi

Along with the others I cannot honestly say that the border really appeals to my tastes either, I think a simple light grey would suit the negative white spaces better – but that’s just really a taste related remark and easily changed.

Compositionally I feel this works well enough; you were obviously attracted to the stem twists and curls, and these do indeed make for an eye interesting design. So overall I feel this image has nice appeal as seen.

Regarding suggestions – I’d consider trying a similar composition type with the white flowered variety of this plant, I feel perhaps this would simplify the colour aspects of the image, and allow a more concentrated view upon the floral shape / stems. It would also perhaps allow an overall high key lighting / exposure look which would perhaps appeal to your tastes.

I would also consider a little more directional lighting, the lighting you have used is indeed nice for the subject material, but perhaps appears a little flat for those important green areas???

Some suggestions you might wish to consider – but mostly just an enjoyable view

All the best
Matthew

denise ippolito
07-29-2010, 10:47 AM
Anita, I like it w/o the border but I prefer the stuff on the bottom-it adds interest IMO.

Kaushik Balakumar
07-29-2010, 02:02 PM
Amazing image. Loved the high-key BG. Very beautifully crafted image.

Norm Dulak
07-29-2010, 02:07 PM
Denise: There was a blue cast, which I've tried to remove.
Ken: I cropped as suggested, and like it better, but miss the bit at the bottom.
Jules: I think I have a vertical of this; will try working on it.
All: No border.
THANKS.:D

Anita:

The graceful stems and the positions of the blossoms and buds make this a work of art.

I like the original better too, and think that the curvaceous elements present at the bottom of the original make a strong contribution to the overall image. The absence of the border in the repost, however, is probably a positive change. I find where image critique is the objective, borders tend to be a bit of a distraction.

I agree with you that the negative space is a bit too dominant. But I wonder whether simply replacing the white with a soft, complementary color might not be as effective as adding texture. A further suggestion would be to increase the saturation of the green elements, to make them more pronounced.:)

But TFS.

Roman Kurywczak
07-29-2010, 09:26 PM
Hey Anita,
man.....am I late to the party! As a general rule.....I don't want a border......but here is the issue.....It depends where and what color BG you present it. Here on BPN....a 2 or 3 pixel black border.....generally works best...to get seperation.....colors get into the personal preference field. My vote goes to OP post.....love the stems....fine/really like the high key BG......small black border for BPN presentation.....you've got a winner in my book!

Jonathan Ashton
07-30-2010, 11:03 AM
Beautiful - gorgeous and fantastic, I even like the border!! I like both posts, on reflection I think I like the composition a little more on the second image but really outstanding images. I could stare all day at flowers like these and never capture the image I wanted. I will have to try to make a mental not of this composition.

Mike Moats
07-30-2010, 11:06 AM
Hey Anita, I really like the original comp, my sugestion would be to add more saturation to the stems to make them pop more. I don't mind the negative space and like the white bg, border color doesn't bother me.

Jim Bridges
07-30-2010, 12:24 PM
<link rel="File-List" href="file:///C:%5CUsers%5CJ&J%7E1.JIM%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtml1%5C01 %5Cclip_filelist.xml"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:RelyOnVML/> <o:AllowPNG/> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> </w:Compatibility> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><style> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Arial Unicode MS"; panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4; mso-font-charset:128; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1 -369098753 63 0 4129279 0;} @font-face {font-family:Georgia; panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5 2 3 3; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:647 0 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:"\@Arial Unicode MS"; panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4; mso-font-charset:128; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1 -369098753 63 0 4129279 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Georgia; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Arial Unicode MS";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]--> I really like the first image... the flowers look so fragile. I have never worked with a white BG, but seeing this kind of image tells me I should expand my perspective. I feel the leaves at the bottom add a nice touch to it as well.<o></o>