Ilija Dukovski
04-28-2009, 10:10 AM
Apropo recent discussion on the ethics of wildlife photography vs. research methods:
http://www.birdphotographers.net/forums/showthread.php?t=33031
I'd like to share with you recent disturbing news published in the April 16 issue of Nature magazine:
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090415/full/458819f.html
In short, a wild Jaguar was captured and released with a radio collar by a team
from the Arizona Game and Fish Dept.
This is the ONLY identified wild Jaguar in the US.
The Jaguar later become ill and was recaptured and killed on March 2nd.
The team stated that the capture was inadvertent.
A further investigation however revealed that the Jaguar was baited with jaguar female scat.
Being a professional scientist, I must admit that ethics concerns, when it comes to wildlife photography,
do not come even close to cases like this...
http://www.birdphotographers.net/forums/showthread.php?t=33031
I'd like to share with you recent disturbing news published in the April 16 issue of Nature magazine:
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090415/full/458819f.html
In short, a wild Jaguar was captured and released with a radio collar by a team
from the Arizona Game and Fish Dept.
This is the ONLY identified wild Jaguar in the US.
The Jaguar later become ill and was recaptured and killed on March 2nd.
The team stated that the capture was inadvertent.
A further investigation however revealed that the Jaguar was baited with jaguar female scat.
Being a professional scientist, I must admit that ethics concerns, when it comes to wildlife photography,
do not come even close to cases like this...