Jared Gricoskie
07-22-2008, 02:16 PM
I have been diving more and more into Macro photography and while working with a longer focus distance of my Sigma 150mm f2.8 on my D300 (225mm 35 equiv) I still find I don't always get the clean background I desire when working with things such as very tiny short flowers. Stuff like 1/8th wide flowers with 2 inch stems etc.
I've read that the larger FX 36mm sensor of a D3 or the new D700 should provide better bokeh @ f2.8 then the same lens with the same settings on the D300 with the DX sensor.
So my questions are:
#1: Is this correct? Any experience you owners of both the D3 and D300
#2: How much of a difference does this make in your opinion to your images? Example images would be awesome.
If its true I'm tempted by the D700 as I continue photographing Colorado Wildflowers for a new field guide.
I've read that the larger FX 36mm sensor of a D3 or the new D700 should provide better bokeh @ f2.8 then the same lens with the same settings on the D300 with the DX sensor.
So my questions are:
#1: Is this correct? Any experience you owners of both the D3 and D300
#2: How much of a difference does this make in your opinion to your images? Example images would be awesome.
If its true I'm tempted by the D700 as I continue photographing Colorado Wildflowers for a new field guide.