David Kennedy
04-26-2008, 11:38 PM
Canon 5D, 16-35mm f/2.8 L II @ 16mm
Exposed 2.5 seconds @ f/22, ISO 160
Lower Antelope Canyon Navajo Tribal Park (Hasdeztwazi), Page, Arizona
This is almost entirely "out of the can." I've cropped it and adjusted the Exposure slider and that's about it (of course, I'm also still out here in Page, Ariz. and my laptop doesn't have the world's best screen!!! One thing I wish I had done (and tried today when I returned to Lower Antelope for a second tour) was to smooth out the footprints in the sand.
I'll be posting about it later, once I return from the Southwest, but I'm using a 16-35 II from Canon Professional Services and, so far, I've been impressed. It's not perfect (it's not the Nikon 14-24mm . . . . .) but it's certainly better than my 17-40mm, and the extra width does help. Dad has been using his 17-40 and the differences in the possibilities between 17mm and 16mm are interesting.
Exposed 2.5 seconds @ f/22, ISO 160
Lower Antelope Canyon Navajo Tribal Park (Hasdeztwazi), Page, Arizona
This is almost entirely "out of the can." I've cropped it and adjusted the Exposure slider and that's about it (of course, I'm also still out here in Page, Ariz. and my laptop doesn't have the world's best screen!!! One thing I wish I had done (and tried today when I returned to Lower Antelope for a second tour) was to smooth out the footprints in the sand.
I'll be posting about it later, once I return from the Southwest, but I'm using a 16-35 II from Canon Professional Services and, so far, I've been impressed. It's not perfect (it's not the Nikon 14-24mm . . . . .) but it's certainly better than my 17-40mm, and the extra width does help. Dad has been using his 17-40 and the differences in the possibilities between 17mm and 16mm are interesting.